Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction - Defendant himself admitted that plaintiff obtained survey nos.28 & 35 in partition and his family members have received some parts in partition - They cannot be permitted to challenge said partition especially when trial Court and Appellate Court have found said partition..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration that plaintiff is deemed tenant/protected licensee of first defendant - Plaintiff and first defendant entered into agreement for conducting the business and plaintiff has taken over business under the agreement - Admittedly, first defendant is in possession of property from defendant No.2 - Agreement of..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Joint Family coparcenary property - Plaintiff failed to prove that suit land was joint Hindu family coparcenary property - Scanty revenue record was produced by plaintiff which by itself does not establish version of plaintiff - Execution of Will in favour of defendants stands..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Registered partition deed was acted upon, which is admitted by defendant - However, defendant failed to prove that partition deed and both the sale deeds have been forged - Suit rightly decreed in favour of plaintiff...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Not maintainable at the instance of licensee after determination of license...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Plaintiff is only a licensee - Licence in favour of plaintiff does not create any right in the property - However, since plaintiff violated conditions of license and license period already expired, he is evicted from suit property long ago - Plaintiff thus, cannot maintain suit for..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration that power of attorney and sale deed is null and void - Plaintiffs failed to exhibit so-called Power of Attorney, which was allegedly executed by plaintiff No.1 in favour of her husband/deceased - Plaintiffs also failed to prove that said Power of Attorney was forged one and on account of forged Power of..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 34 -- Proviso - Suit for injunction simplicter - Not maintainable where complicated disputed questions of fact and law relating to title and possession of parties over suit property involves, as same can only be decided in a comprehensive suit for declaration of title and injunction...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of ownership - Plaintiff purchased suit property as per registered sale deed - Relief sought by plaintiff was only to extent of half share in suit property - Suit for partition filed by defendant against vendor of plaintiff decreed and defendant is entitled for 1/2 share in suit property - Said judgment is..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 5, 34 -- Suit for confirmation of title and recovery of possession - Without seeking relief of declaration - Defendants denied title of plaintiff - Court below committed error in granting decree in favour of plaintiff without asking him for seeking declaration of title u/s 34 of the Act - Impugned order set aside - Matter remanded...........
