Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Sought at the stage of final arguments - No explanation of due diligence for bringing amendment at the stage of final argument - Claim of typographical error/mistake is baseless and cannot be accepted - Application rightly rejected...........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19 -- Sanction for prosecution - Mere fact that there is a typographical error in showing the designation of accused, it cannot be said that sanction issued is bad, particularly when all other details of accused are correct...........
Will -- Suspicious circumstances - Will bears the date 15.01.1999 however same was registered on 13.01.1999 - No explanation forthcoming for said discrepancy except that same was a typographical mistake - One of attesting witnesses of Will was not even able to identify his thumb impression on Will - No reasons given in Will for disinheriting natural heirs by testator -..........
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13 -- Auction sale - Wrong description of property - Borrower failed to demonstrate that due to typographical inadvertent error in door number, property could not fetch value as it ought to have fetched - Auction sale is proper...........
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13 -- Auction sale - Wrong description of property - When there is no ambiguity with regard to detailed description of mortgaged property put to auction, mere mentioning of wrong door numbers is inconsequential and does not vitiate auction proceedings - Moreover,..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Mentioning of wrong cheque number in complaint and/or legal notice - Other factors are also required to be seen - Original cheque was placed on record and the same was exhibited - Cheque as well as signatures on cheque admitted - Mentioning of wrong cheque number in the complaint or in the legal notice..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Typographical error - Plaintiff categorically mentioned in his application U.O.6.R.17 CPC that he got knowledge about incorrectness of khasra number mentioned in the plaint after cross-examination of plaintiff - Order allowing amendment, upheld...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Cheque number has been wrongly mentioned is of no relevance, as it is typographical error and thus, cannot be reason for quashing of proceedings...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Clerical/typographical mistake - Suit for declaration claiming to be co-sharer co-owner to the extent of 1/4th share in the suit land - Amendment of plaint sought to incorporate one Kill No. - Amendment neither changes the area of land nor its location and even after amendment share of plaintiff will..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 451, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 63 -- Release of seized vehicle - Vehicle involved in NDPS case - Confiscated proceedings have not been initiated with regard to vehicle - Court directed to release of seized vehicle - No typographical or any other apparent mistake has been committed in the order -..........
