LawMirror.com

Results of plaintiff+own

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 291-300 of 9894 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Oral Relinquishment deed -- Separate property - Property which is allegedly relinquished in the year 1988 was held by plaintiff by virtue of inheritance by operation of S.6 proviso r/w S.8 and S.19 of Hindu Succession Act, said property was held by her as her separate property which could be relinquished orally...........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 8, Rule 1A, 4 -- Late production of documents - Documents sought to be produced contrary to pleadings - Documents sought to be filed not filed alongwith written statement and failure to satisfactorily account for not pleading them or filing them as required under law - Allowing said documents on record would certainly cause..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3(2) -- Substitution of Legal heir - Death of plaintiff - Application for substitution filed after delay of 3 years from the date of death of plaintiff - However, since legal heir was impleaded only for the purposes of continuation of suit, application not barred by limitation and suit would not abate - Application rightly..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Rebuttal evidence - Recording of statement of fingerprint and handwriting expert - Order was passed in an application for taking specimen handwriting of defendant no.2, that same would be taken up at the time of evidence of plaintiff - However, evidence of plaintiff had been closed and in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3 -- Rebuttal evidence - Expert opinion - Will in question was produced by defendant after closing evidence of plaintiff - Since defendant has led expert evidence in respect of said will thereafter opportunity has to be granted to plaintiff to rebut said evidence - It is also not denied that plaintiff had closed his evidence only..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1 -- Withdrawal of suit with liberty to file afresh suit - Plaintiff sought withdrawal of suit on the ground that certain pleading has been left and material documents have also not been filed - However, such nature of defect is curable - No formal defect or sufficient ground has been established by plaintiff - Application rightly..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33, 35 -- Impounding of document - Unstamped agreement to sell - Plaintiff was claiming relief relying upon agreement of sale and entire suit was based upon said document for recovery of money and damages, same cannot be considered as collateral purpose - Document in question directed to be impounded and only on payment of necessary stamp duty and..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Registered partition deed was acted upon, which is admitted by defendant - However, defendant failed to prove that partition deed and both the sale deeds have been forged - Suit rightly decreed in favour of plaintiff...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Suit for cancellation of sale deed - Mere ground or averment in the plaint that executant of a registered document was not of stable mind, cannot be a ground for cancellation of a duly registered document - No prima facie case and balance of convenience is in favour of plaintiff -..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Written statement - Not filed within time - Defendants have been debarred from filing written statement and matter has been fixed for plaintiff's evidence and defendants cross-examined all the witnesses on several dates - Defence of plaintiff has already been disclosed by way of leading evidence and witnesses have already been..........

Showing : 291-300 of 9894 Results