Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Deceased all alone and unarmed, went to the house of accused `M' to demand his money back - Outside the house, two other accused `D' and `N' get together - Accuse `M' caught hold deceased from his arms - Accused `D' gave repeated stab blows on vital parts of body puncturing heart and lungs - Accused..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 34 -- Common intention - Three ingredients are : (a) Criminal act is done by several persons; (b) such act is done in furtherance of the common intention of all; and (c) Each of such persons is liable for that Act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone - Some individual participation in the commission of criminal act is the..........
Hindu Law -- Doctrine of blending - Necessary ingredients - Held, three necessary ingredients are pleadings, evidence and intention of coparcener to throw property in common stock - In instant case there is neither any common stock nor any intention or evidence as well as no pleadings by plaintiffs...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Murder - Common intention - Plea of co-accused/appellant that hammer blow was not inflicted on deceased by him - Even if, it is assumed that hammer blow given had not fallen on deceased, still factum of deceased being held by appellant while other accused was inflicting injuries on his person was sufficient to hold that he shared..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 300, 327, 324, 34 -- Nature of offence - Murder - Conviction - Upon considering the site of large number of injuries inflicted on person of deceased and injured person, there is no manner of doubt that it was a murderous assault caused by appellants having common intention - Out of 14 injuries 3 were sufficient to cause death in the..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300 -- read with S.34 - Common intention - All accused members of one family and annoyed with members of victim family on account of teasing their womenfolk - Accused came out in a body duly armed and raised lalkara that opposite party be done away with and there after injuries were caused - One of the injured sustained several injuries..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302,34 -- Common intention - Co-accused prevented parents of deceased from rescuing deceased from the clutches of accused persons - Intention of co-accused was to prevent deceased being rescued when accused stabbed deceased - Co-accused are vicariously liable for acts of accused persons...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300 -- Exceptions 1 and 4 - Death caused by accused was not premeditated, accused had no common intention to cause death of deceased, the injuries were not sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to have caused his death - Held, case falls under the Exceptions 1 and 4 to S.300 of IPC...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Appellant along with other two co-accused caused death of a young boy by assaulting him with bricks and cane and thereafter hanging him with a hook of ceiling - Father of deceased who got the FIR recorded gave a graphic description of the role played by each of the accused in beating his son to death - Ocular evidence of father..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Appreciation of evidence - Common intention - Accused persons inflicted 19 stab injuries in body of deceased - One accused person came to place of occurrence and enquired about where about of deceased and stayed there at time of incident - FIR was not ante-timed - Evidence of..........
