LawMirror.com

Results of cross examination

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 301-310 of 1862 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 33(5) -- Further cross examination of victim - Victim was 15 years of age at the time of incident but now she is 18 years of age - Rigor u/s 33(5) of the Act gets diluted once victim crosses age of 18 years...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Re-examination - Cannot be used to give a chance to witness to undo statement of witness made in cross-examination and fill in the lacunae in evidence...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 398, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 -- Offence u/ss 392, 398 IPC and S.25 of Arms Act - Disclosure statements - Entire case of prosecution is based on disclosure statements but prosecution has not been able to prove the same - These statements were never put to complainant and eye witness during cross-examination - Story put forward by..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149, 148, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27 -- Murder - Presence of accused established all through which was referred to in FIR and in the evidence of all concerned eye witnesses - Eye witness account shows participation of accused in the initial scuffle in which deceased were pushed as well as in the exhortation - Evidence of eye..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Loan - Complainant apart from making a bald statement in cross examination had not produced any evidence to substantiate advancing loan - Complainant was not able to discharge onus that cheque was issued for discharge of debt or other liability as no document or books of account were produced -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139 -- Dishonour of cheque - Loan - Date, month or year of advancing loan not pleaded - In cross examination complainant stated that amount was given in 2002 but complaint was filed in the year 2012 as such there was difference of ten years - No written document with regard to lending money - Amount admitted to be given in the..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 10(2) -- Local Commissioner - Summoning of Court Commissioner along with his instruments to make actual demonstration about the procedure followed by him in conducting the survey - Provision does not permit any of the parties for such demonstration - If any of the party is not satisfied with the survey report submitted by the..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 23, Rule 1 -- Withdrawal of suit with liberty to file fresh suit - Reason for withdrawal of suit is that plaintiffs had no knowledge of Will before it was filed in the cross examination of P.W.1 - Case of plaintiffs does not fall under category of formal defect, nor is there any reason to fall within scope of sufficient ground..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106 -- Murder of wife by husband - I.O admitted in her cross-examination that none of witnesses examined during investigation stated that husband and wife were present together in house on the fateful night - Prosecution failed to lead convincing evidence to even prima facie show that accused had any..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 293(2) -- FSL Report - Cross examination of person who has submitted the report - Opportunity not granted - If a report is used as an incriminating piece of evidence against accused, he has got a right to challenge the same - Trial Court to call Director State Forensic Science Laboratory, for cross examination, by accused...........

Showing : 301-310 of 1862 Results