LawMirror.com

Results of report+of+m

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 3091-3100 of 5050 Results

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Local Commissioner - Not examined as a witness - There is no impediment from relying upon the report of Local Commissioner as it is part and parcel of the Court file and relevant and admissible piece of evidence...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Local Commissioner - Appointed by Court - Objections to the report of Local Commissioner - Not maintainable...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 -- Inquest report - Object - To investigate into and draw up a report of the apparent cause of death, describing such wounds as may be found on the body of the deceased and stating as in what manner, or by what weapon or instrument such wounds appear to have been inflicted - Neither necessary nor obligatory for I.O. to investigate..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 -- Inquest report - It is not a statement of a person wherein all the names of accused must be mentioned - Omissions in the inquest report are not sufficient to put the prosecution out of court...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 -- Inquest report - Evidence of eyewitnesses can not be discarded if their names do not figure in the inquest report prepared at the earliest point of time...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 -- Inquest report - Inquest report cannot be treated as substantive evidence but may be utilised for contradicting the witnesses of inquest...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 -- Inquest report - Five blanks in the inquest report such as (1) Crime number; (2) Names of accused persons; (3) Penal provisions; (4) Time of incident and (5) Time of despatch of the special report - It cannot be held that any omission or discrepancy in the inquest is fatal to the prosecution case and such omissions would..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157 -- Delay of five days in sending FIR to Magistrate - Defence did not put any question in this regard to I.O. - Held, no explanation was required to be furnished by him on this issue when prosecution has not asked to explain the delay in sending the special report...........

Showing : 3091-3100 of 5050 Results