Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Jurisdiction - Housing plan - Preparation- Alleged deficiency in service - Almost the entire contract of service is oral - The most of the documents are disputed by both the parties - It cannot be properly adjudicated under the summary jurisdiction by the Consumer Redressal Agencies - The District Forum held not justified in..........
Electricity theft -- Theft of electricity alleged and OP forced to pay Rs. 68946/- to avoid disconnection of electricity - No evidence proving that meter was packed and sealed on the spot and meter was unpacked when it was received in ME Lab - No notice regarding checking in the M.E. Lab was given so that he can present at that time - Report of M.E. Lab does not bear..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(o),2(1),(d) -- Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, Section 80-A - Kerala Co-operative Societies Employees Self Financing Pension Scheme, 1994, Clause 4 and 34 - Service - Pension - Disbursement of pension delayed - Plea with regard to maintainability of complaint - The Board constituted under Clause 4 of the Pension Scheme of..........
Consumer Disputes Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(e) -- Consumer Dispute - Migration certificate - Non issuance of by C.B.S.E. - Held to be administrative function - Findings of the District Forum that the complaint under the provisions of the Act maintainable upheld...........
Consumer Disputes Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Migration certificate - Non issuance of by C.B.S.E. within 48 hours for which extra fee charged - Held to be deficiency in service - Token compensation of Rs. 700/- awarded by the District Forum upheld...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Contract Act, 1872, Section 65 -- Telephone directory - Publishing of - Contract became impossible of performance as permission not granted by the Telecommunication Department for publishing of directory - The OP's legally bound to render service to the complainants namely to refund the amount paid by the complainants when..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial Jurisdiction - Medical negligence - Every part of cause of action occurred at surat - Merely because the complainant came to know about the alleged default/ imperfection on the part of opponent doctor while she had been at her parental home at Rajkot - It cannot be said that any part of cause of action against the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2),(c) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Medical negligence - Every part of cause of action occurred at Surat - Merely because the complainant came to know about the alleged default/imperfection on the part of the OP doctor while she had been at her parental home at Rajkot it cannot be said that any part of cause of action against OP..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64,VB -- Insurance claim - Group Insurance Hospitalisation and Domiciliary Hospitalisation Benefit Policy - Denial of claim on the ground that difference of enhanced premium not deposited in advance by LIC who obtained the policy for its existing or retired employees and it did not intimate the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),&,14 -- Consumer - GPF subscriber - Petitioner - Complainant a member of G.P.F. scheme - She cannot be held a consumer...........
