LawMirror.com

Results of service

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 3341-3350 of 7676 Results

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Expert report - As per expert report there occurred premature replacement and overhauling of the master cylinder of the vehicle and replacement of the entire gearbox during warranty period - Replacement..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Allegation of manufacturing defect, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice against OP No. 1 and 2, i.e. dealer and Manufacturer - Neither any allegation against OP No. 3 who financed the..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Expert report - As per expert report there occurred premature replacement and overhauling of the master cylinder of the vehicle and replacement of the entire gearbox during warranty period - Replacement..........

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Expert report' - As per expert report there occurred premature replacement and overhauling of the master cylinder of the vehicle and replacement of the entire gearbox during warranty period - Replacement..........

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Allegation of manufacturing defect, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice against OP No.1 and 2, i.e. dealer and Manufacturer - Neither any allegation against OP No.3 who financed the vehicle..........

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Expert report' - As per expert report there occurred premature replacement and overhauling of the master cylinder of the vehicle and replacement of the entire gearbox during warranty period - Replacement..........

KERALA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Allegation of manufacturing defect, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice against OP No.1 and 2, i.e. dealer and Manufacturer - Neither any allegation against OP No.3 who financed the vehicle..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2)(b), 33 -- C(2) - Dismissal - During pendency of industrial dispute - Computation of money - Application for - When the management passed order on 24.12.2003 dismissing the petitioners from service the industrial dispute raised by the Union was pending consideration - The employer has to apply for approval of its action of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, Rule 51(4) -- Termination - Teacher appointed against the aided sanctioned post - Termination in contravention of Rule 51(4) of the Rules as prior approval of the Department was not taken by the Managing Committee and the termination order set aside by the DEO and the same affirmed in appeal - High Court upholding the orders granting..........

THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 26 -- Airlines - Air ticket - Frivolous complaint - Allegation that despite confirmation of ticket he was not given reply for confirmation of return ticket and he had to purchase another ticket for his return journey from Athens to Delhi by spending Rs. 37,500/ - The complainant has not mentioned in the complainant..........

Showing : 3341-3350 of 7676 Results