Electricity Act, 2003, Section 43, 67 -- Electricity - Supply of - Owner or occupier of a premises has a statutory right for an electric connection - Supply line passing through a passage - Dispute as to passage whether private or common passage - Pending resolution of the dispute between the parties, appellant cannot be denied supply of electricity to his house - Licensee..........
Electricity -..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397, Electricity Act, Section 39 - - Framing of charge - Revision against - Petitioner availed remedy of filing revision petition before revisional Court against cognizance order and further remedy by way of filing petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. in which petitioner did not challenge the order of cognizance on merit - Held, it will be deemed..........
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 126, 127, 135, 53 -- Theft of energy or unauthorized use of electricity - Electricity Board was taking an action for recovery of Rs.39,400/- and demanding sum to be paid within 15 days - Held, petitioner was entitled to assume that Electricity Board was treating case as an order of assessment u/s.126 and was justified in preferring appeal..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Electricity Act, 2003, Section 152 -- Electricity theft - Compounding of offence - Penalty - Admitted on behalf the petitioner that no notice for compounding offence had been issued - Obviously the Respondent did not have the opportunity to apply for compounding of the same - Findings by the Fora below concluding that the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Electricity Act, 2003, Section 152 -- Electricity theft - Compounding of offence - Penalty - Admitted on behalf the petitioner that no notice for compounding offence had been issued - Obviously the Respondent did not have the opportunity to apply for compounding of the same - Findings by the Fora below concluding that the..........
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 43 -..........
Haryana State Electricity Board Employees (Punishment and Appeal) Regulation, 1990 -..........
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135(1)(b), 151, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 460 -- Theft of electricity - Cognizance of offence by Magistrate on police report is only violation of procedure - Effect on entire proceedings - Held, mere violation of procedure in absence of any prejudice to accused resulting in failure of justice would not vitiate entire proceeding -..........
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135(1)(b) -- Theft of electricity - Conviction - Propriety - 1st appellant is consumer and 2nd appellant is in no way connected with electricity service connection - Conviction on the ground that he happens to be son of 1st appellant - Held, he cannot be held responsible for alleged tampering of the meter only on the ground that he is son of..........
