LawMirror.com

Results of order+9+rule+7+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 351-360 of 10885 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Barred by res judicata - In order to decide an application U.O.7.R.11 CPC, Court has to evaluate the plaint only - In whole of plaint, there is no such averment from which it can be held that suit is barred by res judicata - Plaint cannot be rejected...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197(2), Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, Section 6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 326, 201, 120B, 34 -- Sanction for prosecution - Murder - Sanction as required u/s 6 of 1958 Act has been declined by competent authority - FIRs in question cannot continue any further - However, since State has already assailed said..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Eviction suit - No question framed about lack of evidence, sub letting or incorrect appreciation of facts by Appellate Court on which the final finding of High Court is returned - More so, there is no discussion by High Court as to reasons required for departure from substantial questions of law framed at the stage..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(d), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Appeal - Rejection of an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC in default - Appeal against such an order is maintainable, as words rejecting an application are comprehensive enough to include dismissal for default or rejecting in any other situation whatever...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 6 -- Defendant proceeded ex parte - Application to strike out defence - Notwithstanding an order passed earlier to proceed ex parte, while deciding an application for striking out defence, it was duty of Court to give an opportunity of being heard to the defendants - However, that was not done - Order striking out defendants'..........

SIKKIM HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 126 -- Maintenance to wife - Order directing interim maintenance to wife is only an interlocutory order, as rights and liabilities of parties have not attained finality - Order granting maintenance is proper...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 116 -- Inquiry u/s 116 Cr.P.C. - Opportunity to adduce evidence as part of defence or an opportunity to hear not provided - Impugned order passed without following procedure as nearly as may be practicable in the manner prescribed for conducting trial and recording evidence in summons case - Impugned order set aside - Matter remanded..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 132 -- Summoning of additional accused who deposed as PW - An order for initiation of process u/s 319 Cr.P.C against a witness, who has deposed in the trial and has tendered evidence incriminating himself, would be tested on the anvil that whether only such incriminating statement has formed the basis..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438 -- Anticipatory bail - Law as to: (i) Accused is entitled to seek anticipatory bail in connection with an offence so long as he is not arrested in relation to that offence - Once he is arrested, only remedy available to him is to apply for regular bail either u/s 437 or S.439 Cr.P.C, as the case may be; (ii) There is no express or..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47 -- Execution - Objection regarding impleadment of LR's of DH - Objection was dismissed vide detailed order - No challenge was made to said order - Thereafter first execution petition remained pending for more than 3 months before it was withdrawn - Petitioner having not laid any challenge to said orders cannot plea qua same that too..........

Showing : 351-360 of 10885 Results