Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),21 -- Banking service - Deficiency in service - Complicated issues of law and facts - Allegation of deficiency regarding the encashment of various bank guarantees, intermingling of several accounts of the complainant which he was maintaining with the OP due to which he suffered financial loss, loss of reputation/goodwill and..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Scooter - Starting trouble in self start scooter purchased by complainant respondent a senior citizen not rectified despite several visits by the appellants - District Forum holding deficiency in service on the part of appellant since after the intervention of District Forum defect in scooter was rectified by..........
Registration Act, 1908, Section 17, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 54 -- Goodwill - Its sale of even less than Rs.100/- requires compulsory registration...........
Hindu Law -- Family settlement - Disputant who claims himself to be member of family and has not even a remote chance of succession - Cannot be said to be a member of the family - Question of settlement of dispute between such a member of the family and those who have right of succession - Does not arise - Consideration for family settlement - Expectation that such family..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21 -- Airlines - Deficiency in service - Allegation of negligence and deficiency in service by complainant against KLM Royal Dutch Airlines for subjecting him to security check at Amsterdam on the ground that doubt appeared about the bona fide of his travel documents - Difference in the complaint and the first version given..........
Partnership -- Appellant due to his old age, stepped out from business, foregoing his right to share in goodwill of firm - Partnership firm mutually stood dissolved on 14.2.1970 - Respondents constituted new partnership firm and continued same business - Held, High Court was not right in concluding that old firm was subsisting on 29.2.1972 and consequently, appellant is..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 21 -- Deficiency in service - Bank Draft - Drafts returned unpaid with remarks "exceeds arrangement" - Ultimately paid when presented for encashment - Goodwill seriously affected - Draft unhonoured due to oversight by dealing official - Claim for compensation cannot be for actual loss or damage - Deficiency on part of bank..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38 -- Permanent injunction - Trade mark - Infringement - Trade mark INTEL used by plaintiff in Computer and Software development etc. - Defendants using deceptively similar trade mark ART INTEL for similar products - Difference of prefix 'ART' - It likely to cause deception to unwary purchasers - Use of similar mark will mislead..........
