LawMirror.com

Results of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 67

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 31-40 of 119 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Contraband - Statement u/s 67 of the Act - There were no injuries on the person of accused at the time of arrest - Accused was badly beaten up just before his arrest or immediately after his arrest - Therefore statements made to NCB officials u/s 67 of the Act cannot be called voluntarily and have to be..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Recovery of 139 kg ganja - Confessional statement - Merely because statement of accused was recorded by Sub-Inspector of Police, that by itself would not render accused's statement unworthy of acceptance or even unworthy of being basis for conviction...........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Confession - Recovery of 15 kg 600 gms Ganja - No force or coercion was used for recording statement of accused u/s 67 of the Act and that too when they were not made accused - Confession of accused thus, reliable - Moreover, said statement of accused was not sole basis of conviction of accused -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Contraband - Confessional statement of co-accused cannot be treated as evidence against other accused except in cases where there is a specific provision in law making such confession of a co-accused admissible against other accused...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Recovery of 3.990 kg heroin - Confessional statement of co-accused - Cannot by itself be taken as a substantive piece of evidence against co-accused and can at best be used or utilized in order to lend assurance to Court - Moreover, in absence of any substantive evidence it would be inappropriate to base..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21(C), 23(C), 29, 67, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439 -- Bail - Recovery of 3.2 kg cocaine - Petitioner apprehended not solely on the statement of co-accused but also arrested as part of search and seizure operation from one of places which was disclosed by co-accused during operation - Not only..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67, 8, 18, 29 -- Confession - Recovery of 7.2 kg opium - Confessional statement of accused recorded while he was in custody and time was not mentioned on statements - Said fact is corroborated by Narcotic Officer and PW6 - Statement of accused confessing crime was thus, not voluntarily made and hence not..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Recovery of heroin - Statement u/s 67 of the Act - Evidentiary value - Court should not lose sight of ground realities and should take into consideration whether confession was made under duress or was voluntary in nature...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Recovery of heroin - Conviction should not be based merely on statement u/s 67 of the Act, without independent corroboration...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Recovery of heroin - Statement u/s 67 of the Act - If person in custody is subjected to interrogation, he must be informed in clear and unequivocal term his right to silence...........

Showing : 31-40 of 119 Results