LawMirror.com

Results of 1

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 4251-4260 of 6228 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 1, 2 -- Non framing of a particular issue - Parties going to trial knowing fully well the real issues involved and adduced evidence - Objection as to non framing of a particular issue cannot be raised...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Transferee pendente lite - Impleading as a party - Application of transferee pendente lite for impleading him a party to the suit should ordinarily be allowed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Impleading of a party - Transferee pendente lite - Can be impleaded as a party if his interest in the subject matter of suit is substantial and not just peripheral - Court has discretion in the matter which must be judicially exercised and an alienee would ordinarily be joined as a..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10 -- Transferee pendente lite - Impleading as a party in second appeal - Delay in approaching Court sufficiently, properly and satisfactorily explained - Transferee pendente lite should be made as party to the pending second appeal as prayed for by him - He is at liberty to contest..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 1(2) -- Domicile in India is a condition precedent for invoking the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act - Domicile is to be determined when parties tie nuptial knot under the Hindu Marriage Act and not the date when an application is made for matrimonial relief - Even if a party establishes that after marriage he acquired domicile of some..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 1(2) -- Applicability of the Act - Domicile of India is a condition precedent for invoking the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act - Principles governing domicile are: (a) Domicile of origin i.e. by birth and domicile of choice i.e. residing in a country other than that of his domicile of origin with intention of continuing to reside there..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 10, 19, 1(2) -- Parties married in India - Marriage registered under Hindu Marriage Act - Parties left for Sweden and acquiring Swedish citizenship - Parties then left for Australia - Did not acquire Swedish or Australian domicile - Wife filed petition for judicial separation in India - Court in India has jurisdiction as parties never..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1 -- Injunction - Violation of - Writ petition seeking police help for enforcement - Not maintainable - Remedy is to approach civil court for relief...........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9 -- Declaration and permanent injunction suit - Necessary party - Non - impleadment - Not fatal to suit - Such party not bound by the said judgement and decree...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Provision is directory and not mandatory - Power of Court to extend time for filing written statement beyond time schedule provided U.O.8.R.1 CPC is not completely taken away - Time schedule contained in the provision is to be followed as a rule and departure therefrom would be by way of exception - Extension of time may be..........

Showing : 4251-4260 of 6228 Results