LawMirror.com

Results of order+7 +rule+7+of+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 431-440 of 687 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1995
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 40, Rule 1 -- Suit by Banks or Financial institutions for realisation of loans - Courts must be conscious of involvement of public money in such suits and recovery should not be hampered by denial of just relief admissible under Order 40 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1995
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14 -- Order 7 Rule 14 does not apply in respect of a document produced to rebut the plea raised by the defendant...........

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 16 -- Revision, disposal of on mutual consent of both the parties-Court should not proceed on the basis of any oral statement that may have been made by the parties regarding a compromise-Compromise between the parties has to be recorded before the Court-Should be recorded in writing with parties signatures which should bind them down to..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 19, Rule 1, 2 -- Distinction between the two provisions - Stated - Affidavits assume the character of evidence if permitted to be produced by Court for proving a prima facie case and not on merits subject to limitations under Order 19 Rule 1, 2 CPC...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35(3), 97 -- Decree for possession of immovable property - Obstruction by third party - Decree holder gets right under Rule 97 of Order 21 to make an application against third party to have his obstruction removed...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 23, Rule 3 -- Compromise - Validity - Can be challenged either in a petition under proviso to Rule 3 of Order 23 or an appeal under S.96(1) CPC...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A -- The thrust of Rule 2-A is not of implementation of the order but of punishment of violation of order of injunction or of undertaking given to the Court...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A -- Disobedience of injunction - Court does not become functus officio on decision of the case and the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A cannot be dismissed solely on that ground...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 95, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 134 -- Auction purchaser applying for possession of property purchased in Court sale - Limitation - Period of one year starts from date of issuance of sale certificate and not from date of confirmation of sale even though sale becomes absolute on confirmation - Order 21 Rule 95 applies to all..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 104, Order 39, Rule 2-A -- Order of detention In civil prison passed under order 39 Rule 2-A for flouting order of Injunction - Order is appealable under S.104(h) of the Code...........

Showing : 431-440 of 687 Results