LawMirror.com

Results of i+p+c+indian+penal+code+420

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 451-460 of 32875 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376DA, 376DB -- Rape - Sentence - Right to seek remission is not only a constitutional right but also a statutory right - Even in a case where punishment is awarded u/s 376-DA or S.376-DB IPC to the effect that accused shall be punished with imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for remainder of that person's natural life..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 389 -- Suspension of sentence during pendency of appeal against conviction - Murder - Specific allegations against appellant to the effect that he had kept women & others captive, but there are certainly some debatable issues particularly regarding cause of death being homicidal or not - Even eye-witness, who are relatives of deceased..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22A -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint against sick company - There is no embargo on filing a complaint u/s 138 of N.I. Act against a sick company - Even if there is a restraint order u/s 22-A of SICA, nature of restraint order and facts of case would have..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22A -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint against sick company - Restraint order u/s 22-A of SICA did not restrain accused/company to draw on its assets to meet its day-to-day operations - Cheques in question were issued to discharge liability of..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Amendment of complaint - Where there is a simple/curable infirmity in complaint and it does neither change the nature of complaint nor cause prejudice to accused persons, a formal amendment in complaint may be permitted...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Amendment of complaint - Modification of a complaint may be permitted where cognizance has not yet been taken and alteration does not alter the essential character of complaint, defect sought to be rectified is one which can be cured through a formal amendment and where such modification does not result..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Amendment of complaint - Complaint filed against accused as proprietor of firm, whereas cheque was issued by partnership firm and partnership firm not arraigned as an accused - Non impleadment of firm is a curable defect - Effective trial not yet commenced - Complainant permitted to file an application..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 4, 118 -- Promissory note - Cash transaction - There is initial presumption of legally enforceable debt - Onus is on defendant to prove that no such amount was given - Sometimes there may be an occasion where even for a cash transaction, a receipt is taken, but absence of the same would not negate and disprove the stand that cash..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 4, 118 -- Promissory note - Recovery suit - Cash transaction - Merely because a person is not able to prove transfer through official modes i.e. through any negotiable instrument or bank transaction would not lead to conclusion that such amount was not paid through cash, especially when there was a categorical statement to this..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 4, 118 -- Promissory note - Recovery suit - Specific stand of plaintiff that he has paid Rs.30,80,000 to defendant pursuant to promissory note - Onus would be on defendant to dispel such fact - Merely because plaintiff is not able to prove transfer through official modes i.e. through any negotiable instrument or bank transaction..........

Showing : 451-460 of 32875 Results