LawMirror.com

Results of possession+of+trespasser

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 461-470 of 9368 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Plaintiff sought prescriptive title on the basis of UDR patta issued in his name - However, said patta have no seal of official who signed the document - Even, date of document also not mentioned - Patta was issued in favour of plaintiff without notice to defendants, who were original..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for injunction - Question involved in suit pertains to possession and does not relate to dispute involving title - Plaintiff proved his possession, supported by documentary evidence in the form of revenue records - In case defendant has any right over subject properties, he can claim possession from plaintiffs, only by..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Plaintiff has failed to prove his adverse title by leading cogent evidence - Therefore, additional document produced by defendants are not necessary to dispose of the appeal and there is no need to afford an opportunity to plaintiff to cross-examine defendants with..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Registration Act, 1908, Section 49 -- Proviso - Un-registered sale deed - Suit for permanent injunction - Suit is only filed for permanent injunction and not for declaration of title over property - Un-registered sale deed thus, can be received as evidence for collateral purpose to prove the possession of property subject to proof and relevancy...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 458, 342, 380 -- Offence u/ss 458, 342, 380 IPC - Temple properties were seized from accused in the presence of PW5 - No explanation or any reason was given by accused for having possession of temple properties - Accused rightly convicted - However, trial Court without supporting any evidence and materials relied upon pending cases against..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32(5) -- Execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Violation of decree - J.D. subsequently trespassed into the property and remained in possession therein - Decree can be enforced by evicting JD from the property...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Plaintiff failed to produce any cogent evidence on record to establish his actual physical possession over suit property - There is thus, no documentary evidence available on record to show possession of plaintiff - No doubt, some witnesses have orally deposed in support of plaintiff, but mere oral deposition..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration - Mortgage property - Suit for declaration that plaintiffs become owners in possession of suit land by prescription of time, since the same was not redeemed by mortgagor or his successor-in-interest - Not maintainable, as once a mortgage always a mortgage and there would be no period for redemption for the same...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15 -- Recovery of 50 bags of poppy husk - Identity of accused - Accused fled away from the spot and was not arrested from the spot along with contraband - However, no test identification parade was conducted to ascertain the identity of accused, as PW6/ASI expressed his ability to identify accused as he knew..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for possession - Plaintiff failed to prove title of his vendor - He has also failed to prove that in the year 1967, defendants forcibly made opening in their western wall and took possession - Houses of defendants were located nearby as memorandum of partition - Water pipes/channels/outlets of defendants house..........

Showing : 461-470 of 9368 Results