LawMirror.com

Results of negotiable+138

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 4691-4700 of 7596 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Sentence - Accused 65 years of age - Seniority cannot earn immunity from imposing substantive sentence...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Received back with postal endorsement `Unclaimed' - Second notice served at the same address - Complaint cannot be quashed on the ground that there is presumption of service of first notice and complaint is not filed within time - There is no rule of universal application that in all cases..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139 -- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Available only when there is either admission or proof of execution of the cheque...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Returned with endorsement 'addressee left' - In absence of proof that endorsement was mala fide, service of notice cannot be presumed...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonor of cheque - Jurisdiction - Courts where any of the five acts are done have jurisdiction to entertain complaint, viz. (a) Drawing of the cheque; (b) Presentation of the cheque to the bank; (c) Returning the cheque unpaid by the drawee bank; (d) Giving notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque demanding payment to..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Transaction took place at Jaipur - Cheque issued of a bank at Delhi - Cheque presented at Mumbai - Notice issued from Mumbai where registered office of the complainant company is situated - Complaint filed at Mumbai - Held, Court at Mumbai has jurisdiction...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27 -- Dishonour of cheque - Demand notice - Sent through registered post at correct address - Postal authorities sent intimation to accused about the registered cover - Held, it is proper service of notice...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 357 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque amount Rs.50, 000/- - Accused sentenced and convicted to 8 months SI - In revision accused ready to deposit the amount - Request allowed - In the matter of dishonour o cheque, compensatory aspect remedy shall be given preference than the punitive aspect..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Transfer of complaint - From a Court within jurisdiction of one High Court to a Court within jurisdiction of another High Court - Petition for transfer of complaint is maintainable in the High Court having supervisory jurisdiction of Court where complaint is filed...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73 -- Expert opinion - Dishonour of cheque - Comparison of disputed document with admitted document - Duty of Court - Held, Court should be slow to compare disputed document with admitted document for comparison although S.73 empowers Court to compare disputed writings with specimen/admitted..........

Showing : 4691-4700 of 7596 Results