LawMirror.com

Results of consumer ex parte

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 53 Results

UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(b),15 -- Revision - Appeal - Ex-parte order on merits passed directing the petitioner OP to make payment of Gratuity and GPF - Preliminary objection taken that revision filed against the order not competent - Plea of the petitioner OP that revision lies as matter relates to jurisdiction which has been wrogly decided by the District..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17 -- Ex parte order - Review/recall of order - Application for alleging fraud - Held that the remedy for the applicant was to challenge the order in appeal if so advised and not by way of filing the present application - Application dismissed as not maintainable...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227 -- Complaint - Procedure - There is no power for the Forum to declare ex-parte or pass an order or take a decision ex-parte u/s 13 of the Act - Under Rule 4 Sub-rule 8 of the Kerala Consumer Protection Rules, power is given to the District Forum to decide the complaint ex-parte if the..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13,14 -- Ex parte order - Mode which was adopted for sending the notice has not been tick marked and other modes which were not resorted too were not scored of - There is not postal receipt or certificate of posting place on record of the complaint file - There is no endorsement of the office on the record of the complaint case as to..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Ex parte order - Appeal - Appellant proceeded ex parte as the summon sent not accepted - The cover returned by the post office has an endorsement which is not clear - Having regard to the averment in the affidavit that during the relevant time the appellant was away, the appellant/first OP can be given a chance to contest the..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13,14 -- Ex parte order - The relevant mode has not been tick marked nor other modes which were not resorted to were not scored of - The case of the respondent that the notice was sent under certificate of posting - There is an assertion of the fact made by the appellant that he did not receive the notice of the District Forum the..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14,15 -- Ex parte order - Appeal against - The appellants had been duly informed of the proceedings on respective dates who were not present on most of the dates including on the date of hearing - The District Forum perused in detail the reply filed by the appellant and passed a reasoned order and the entire record produced by the..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELEHI

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Ex parte proceedings -- Setting aside of - Applicant respondent proceeded ex parte in appeal presuming service as the registered letter not received back undelivered - Application duly supported by affidavit that applicant respondent not served - Plea of the non applicant appellant that there is no provision in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to set aside the ex-parte..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Appeal - Ex parte order - Appellant complainant proceeded ex parte on the ground that notices sent to them were not received back undelivered and hence presumption has been drawn in favour of service - The appellant filed his affidavit deposing that he did not receive any notice of complaint case - The presumption raised by the..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 19 -- Ex parte Order - State Commission passed ex parte order in favour of the complainant under an erroneous impression that opposite party had not filed a written version - Case remanded to State Commission - Even if the opposite party was not represented by counsel on the subsequent day on which the case was taken up for hearing it..........

Showing : 41-50 of 53 Results