LawMirror.com

Results of consumer protection deficiency of service

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 925 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Deficiency in service - Hire purchase agreement - Default in payment of installments - Repossession of vehicle by Financier without notice to hirer/complainant - Where requirement to serve notice before repossession is implicit in hire purchase agreement, non service of proper notice would tantamount to deficiency of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Deficiency in service - Hire purchase agreement - Default in payment of installments - Non-production of agreement by financier - Adverse inference - No adverse inference could have been drawn against Financier for not producing Hire purchase agreement before District Forum, particularly when there was no allegation in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Deficiency in service - Failure of developer to comply with contractual obligation to provide flat to a flat purchaser within a contractually stipulated period amounts to a deficiency in service...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(1)(c) -- Allotment of flat - Delay in handing over possession - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Where there is gross delay in handing over possession by builder beyond contractually stipulated period, flat purchaser is entitled to just and reasonable compensation for such delay - However, such compensation not constrained by..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12 -- Insurance claim - Damage to stock and machineries by fire - Non-coverage of whole set of hypothecated assets under insurance policy by Bank - Deficiency in service - Bank remained silent to two letters of respondent seeking particulars of policy - Stand of bank that policy and statements were made available to Directors of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Theft of IVPs (Indira Vikas Patras) - Claim of return of maturity sum - Deficiency in service on part of post office - IVPs were purchased through cash - Identity of purchaser is disputed - Refusal on part of Department to entertain any request of maturity sum was absolutely right and justified - There was thus, no..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12 -- Insurance claim - Accidental fire - Destruction of agriculture produce stored in cold store - Liability of insurance company - Tripartite agreement entered into between Bank, cold store and farmers - Deficiency in service on part of Bank - Some of names of farmers not mentioned in policy and tripartite agreement was not handed..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 23 -- Insurance claim - Accident policy for account holders of Bank - Deficiency in service on part of Bank in failing to forward application form to insurer and in deducting insurance premium on time - Had bank not deficient in performing of its services, deceased would have been entitled to an insurance cover in same terms as was..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Deficiency in service - Flight of respondents missed because they have not reached at boarding gate in time - Respondents were treated as `Gate No Show' - Mere fact that respondents were not accommodated in next flight without payment of airfare, per se cannot be regarded as deficiency in service in relation to contract..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Airlines - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Respondents contended that they were left behind by ground staff of appellant Airlines and concerned flight departed, without any information about its departure given to them - Even, respondents requested ground staff of appellant to accommodate in next available flight but..........

Showing : 41-50 of 925 Results