LawMirror.com

Results of ex parte

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 1599 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Recovery suit -- Defendant was set ex parte - Only defence raised by defendant in written statement was that document admitting outstanding amount was not executed by an authorised person - However, apart from said document plaintiff has placed on record relevant invoices - Ledger statement relating to defendant shows a closing balance of Rs.2,21,40,895 - Memorandum of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Defendant was duly served and even filed written statement - He thus, cannot be allowed to plead that he was not aware of ex parte decree - Merely because defendant sold or had agreed to sell property in dispute to third party, who had asked defendant to take care of litigation, cannot be..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Limitation - Defendant was duly served and even filed written statement - Limitation for moving application for setting aside ex parte decree U.O.9.R.13 CPC thus, to commence from date of ex parte decree and not from the date of alleged knowledge...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration that Sanad Takseem and mutation on basis of instrument of partition is illegal, null and void - Plaintiff was proceeded ex parte by Revenue Court in partition suit - If plaintiff is aggrieved by order passed by revenue authorities, then remedy available to him is to file appeal before superior Revenue Court -..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 15, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Petitioner was served at the address mentioned in sale deed itself - Substituted service was not shown to be fraudulent - Both courts below have concurrently found no procedural irregularity sufficient to set aside ex parte order in retrospect particularly in light of subsequent..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 15, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Once an appellate Court sets aside a trial Court's judgment and remands the matter for re-consideration, all prior proceedings except those expressly preserved stand subsumed in remand - Procedural integrity of earlier interlocutory orders loses operative force unless challenged..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Reasons for delay were well explained in application U.O.9.R.13 CPC and thereafter application u/s 5 of Limitation Act was also submitted for condonation of delay - Application U.O.9.R.13 CPC was not defective - Moreover, delay was hardly of six days and same was explained by petitioners - Ex..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13 -- Ex parte divorce decree - Setting aside - Maintainability - Husband has not filed application U.O.9.R.13 CPC on the ground of non-service of summons on him - Therefore, O.9.R.13 Second Proviso CPC is not attracted - Reliance on second proviso by wife is thus found to be misconceived -..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13, 28 -- Ex parte divorce decree - Setting aside - In view of S.21 of Hindu Marriage Act, applicability of provisions of O.9.R.13 CPC cannot be ousted...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 6 -- Defendant proceeded ex parte - He cannot produce evidence in defence - Limited right of such defendant is confined to cross examine plaintiff's witnesses...........

Showing : 41-50 of 1599 Results