Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 427, 452, 143, 147, 148, 149, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 3, 5 -- Murder - Recovery of articles at the instance of A-10 to A-13 - Recoveries are said to have been made from house of PW21 having no connection with A-10 - Recovery of such an incriminating article was made from a place that might also be accessible to PW21 is..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 143, 147, 148, 427, 452, 302, 149, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 3 -- Murder - Conviction - The High Court upheld the conviction of A2, A4, A5, A8, and A9 for offences under Sections 460, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC and Section 427 IPC and Section 3 of the Explosives Substances Act and allowed by overturning the acquittal qua A10..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 308, 447, 427, 341, 323, 325, 34 -- Attempt to commit culpable homicide - Injury report of injured though reveal grievous injuries, but none of them have been opined to be dangerous to life - However, medical report showing extraction of pellet from the lip of victim which has changed the dimension of case - Such medical evidence cannot be..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 323, 387, 452, 427, 34 -- Attempt to murder - Informant alleged that accused threatened him against lodging a report but in his evidence he stated that he went alone immediately afterwards to lodge report - Conduct of informant appears to be unnatural - Informant alleged that accused had hit him with but of a gun, stick and kicks, but..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 147, 148, 149 -- Murder - Accused Nos.1 to 3 were identified by eye witnesses and injured eye witnesses - There are no major/material contradictions in the deposition of eye witnesses and injured eye witnesses - Merely because witnesses were relatives of deceased, their evidence cannot be discarded solely on that..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 147, 148, 149 -- Murder - Overt acts of accused Nos.4 to 11 are different than that of accused Nos.1 to 3 - Case of accused Nos.4 to 11 is not comparable with case of accused Nos.1 to 3 - Moreover, findings recorded in respect of acquittal of accused Nos.4 to 11 are on appreciation of evidence on record and view..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20, 61, 85, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 427, 216, 34 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 20, 61, 85 NDPS Act, S.25 Arms Act and u/ss 395, 427, 216, 34 IPC - Recovery of 17 quintals 12 kg and 760 grams ganja from canter - From disclosure..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 323, 341, 324, 147, 148, 149, 427, 504, 506 -- Bail - Double murder case - Accused is a history sheeter and is having criminal antecedents - He is involved in double murder of having killed the father and brother of informant - Trial of cases is at the crucial stage of recording evidence..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 354, 427, 458, 143, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(s), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2)(va), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Offence u/ss 323, 354, 427, 458, 143 IPC and Ss.3(1)(s), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act - Quashing of FIR - Compromise arrived at..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 323, 325, 341, 380, 427, 506, 148 -- Anticipatory bail - Attempt to murder - Offence punishable u/s 307 IPC added on basis of medical opinion - No new fact except medical opinion has come during investigation, which required any specific further investigation by police - Without commenting on..........
