LawMirror.com

Results of new rent act u p

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 128 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97 -- Execution - Eviction decree - Objection by sub-tenants - Sub-tenants contended that sub-letting is lawful as per Karnataka Rent Act - Contention rejected, as suit was filed seeking eviction of JD by terminating tenancy u/s 106 of T.P Act, therefore, provisions of Karnataka Rent Act held, not applicable...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 50, 2(i), Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, Section 19 -- Second appeal - Suit for possession and mense profit - Tenancy of defendants/appellants were terminated - Once tenancy of appellants/defendants of suit property stood terminated, the status of appellants/defendants was not..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106 -- Lease deed - Notice - Suit for possession - Once there exists landlord and tenant relationship between parties and rate of rent is above Rs.3500/- p.m in Delhi and there is no registered lease deed for tenanted premise, then, by serving notice u/s 106 of the Act suit for possession can be filed - Infact, there is no need of..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of eviction petition - Amendment sought by tenant pertains to maintainability of eviction petition in view of bar u/s 14(6) of H.P Urban Rent Control Act - However, very same question was earlier raised by tenant by filing application U.O.7.R.11 CPC before Rent Controller - However, same application though allowed..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 193, Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, Section 23(2) -- False evidence - Jurisdiction of Rent Control Court - Rent Control Court is not empowered to initiate prosecution for offence u/s 193 IPC on allegation that false evidence is given during course of proceedings...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 6, Rule 17, Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, Section 11(2)(b), 11(3), 11(4)(iii), 23(1)(j) -- Amendment of Pleadings - Rent and Eviction - Subsequent events - If grounds were not available on date of filing of petition, it will not fall under "defect" or "error" contemplated u/S.23(1)(j) of Act - If the..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 6, Rule 17, Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, Section 23(1)(j) -- Amendment of Pleadings - Rent and Eviction - Grounds available for amendment u/O.6.R.17 of CPC is more wide than grounds provided u/S.23(1)(j) of Act - But in view of rigour u/S.23(1)(j) of Act such grounds available u/O.6.R.17 cannot be..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, Section 23(1)(j) -- Amendment of pleadings - Eviction suit - Cause of action for eviction on new ground, which is intended to be incorporated by way of amendment has arisen after filing of Rent Control Petition - Said ground cannot be allowed to be incorporated by way of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - Dispute regarding ownership - Admittedly, property was leased out in year 2007 and application was filed for eviction on 2013 - Litigation qua title is already pending in civil proceedings and the same as such would have no immediate bearing on East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act - Thus, where..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Plaintiff being tenant of property paid the advance consideration and thus no longer liable to pay any future rent to defendant/landlord - Possession of plaintiff therefore, of suit property was effectively as a right of part performance u/s 53-A of T.P.Act - Plaintiff continued in possession under doctrine of part performance,..........

Showing : 41-50 of 128 Results