LawMirror.com

Results of order+18+rule+5+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5021-5030 of 11027 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 -- Appeal against acquittal - Power to re-appreciate evidence - Held, while dealing with an appeal against acquittal, High Court has a duty to scrutinize evidence and sometimes it is an obligation on part of High Court to do so - Power is not curtailed by any of provision of CrPC - While re-appreciating and reconsidering evidence..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 145 -- East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, S.13(2)(i) - Eviction - Tenancy - Whether proceedings u/s.145 Cr.P.C. will have any bearing to rent control proceedings? - Held, it has to be always seen in context in which order is sought to be issued - There could be no rule of thumb that S.145 Cr.P.C. will have no meaning to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Quashing of proceedings - Petitioners-accused had intention to cheat & misappropriate amount of complainant from very beginning - They have received huge amount of Rs.81,63,000/- in lieu of earnest money but did not execute sale deed of entire land in order to cheat and misappropriate..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 18, 3(i)(x) -- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/s.3(1)(x) of the Act of 1989 - Bar as to grant of anticipatory bail - Applicability - Specific averment in complaint that Petitioner No.1 gave beatings to complainant and called him `Khatikde' in..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, 29, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401 -- Order passed by Magistrate excluding opposite party Nos.1 to 4 from category of respondents on ground that they being women relatives of husband of petitioner, thus, they cannot be added as respondents - Revision against - Maintainability - Held, impugned..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Additional accused - Law as to - Summed up : (i) Power to summon an accused is discretionary and extra-ordinary power, which should be exercised sparingly and only if compelling reasons exist at any stage of case; (ii) The order passed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure summoning an additional accused should..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Additional accused - Accused summoned u/s 319 Cr.P.C. has to be jointly tried with other co-accused and trial Court is not justified in separating the case of revisionist and deciding the case of rest of the accused - Moreover, statement of PW1 in cross-examination ruling out the involvement of revisionist - Possibility of..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 341, 324, 325, 447, 148, 149, 307 -- Quashing of FIR and order taking cognizance - (i) Series of litigation does not ipso facto make the FIR lodged with certain ulterior motive; (ii) Once there is formation of an unlawful assembly, once there is an assault, once there are injuries sustained,..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4 -- Restoration of suit - Suit dismissed for non compliance of order to pay deficiency in Court fee - Application filed after three months - Plea that application U.O.9.R.4 is not maintainable - Held, nomenclature is not decisive - Even though separate application for condonation of delay was not filed however in the restoration..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2) -- Impleading of a party - Suit on basis of registered Will as well as adoption - Applicants claiming their right being Class I heirs - To avoid multiplicity of litigation and to resolve the controversy in dispute, the applicants are necessary parties - Order allowing application calls for no interference...........

Showing : 5021-5030 of 11027 Results