LawMirror.com

Results of self cheque

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5161-5170 of 7072 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Non appearance of counsel of appellant - Case dismissed for non prosecution - Case was filed in 2005 and was listed on 17.3.2008 for first time and on next day it was dismissed for non prosecution - Order of High Court set aside - Case remanded back...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 46, 48 -- Dishonour of cheque - Holder in due course - Other than the payee - There must be indorsement in his favour and delivery of cheque - Delivery of cheque alone is not sufficient...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction of accused - Appeal against judgment of conviction and order of sentence - Appellate Court while suspending execution of sentence imposed condition of asking appellant to remain present in court - Held, condition is harsh and puts accused in difficult position - Court can ask accused to..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20, 21 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Transferred to Lok Adalat - Compromise by parties - Lok Adalat passed an award for Rs.4 lacs - Such an award is a decree - The same is executable under Civil Procedure Code...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20, 21, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 1 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint transferred to Lok Adalat - Compromise by parties - Award of Rs.4 lacs passed - Such an award is a decree and same is executable under CPC - Execution - Pecuniary jurisdiction of Court..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20, 21 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Transferred to Lok Adalat - Compromise by parties - Lok Adalat passed an award for Rs.4 lacs - Such an award is a decree - The same is executable under Civil Procedure Code...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20, 21, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 1 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint transferred to Lok Adalat - Compromise by parties - Award of Rs.4 lacs passed - Such an award is a decree and same is executable under CPC - Execution - Pecuniary jurisdiction of Court..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64 -- Fishing vessel - Insurance policy - Premium instalment - Cheque payment - Premium instalment due on 14.10. 1991 - Cheque towards second premium instalment receive on 6.11.1991 was encashed on 25.11.1991 - In the absence of pleading and proof the Insurance Company who had kept the cheque from..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - New plea - Dispute with regard to payment of a sum of Rs. 40,000/ - which was allegedly paid in cash apart from a sum of Rs. 53,720/ - paid by cheque - Debit vouchers referred not produced before below Fora below - Neither pleaded in reply in response to the complaint nor does it find mention in the..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque returned with endorsement 'funds not arranged for' - Accused denied his liability to pay, as cheque was issued in pursuance of agreement to sell and when he came to know that complainant is not the owner of plot he did not arrange for the funds - Legal effect of presumption available u/s 139 not..........

Showing : 5161-5170 of 7072 Results