LawMirror.com

Results of +Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances+act+

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5231-5240 of 5374 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42 -- Mandatory provision - PW5 not recorded the information in writing given by PW3 with respect to the appellants' involvement before proceeding to arrest him in this case - Writing or communication resulting in delay in trapping, which may lead the accused to escape, then prosecution case should not be thrown..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50 -- Oral communication - Is also valid...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 57 -- Compliance of the provision - Copies of FIR and other records regarding the arrest of appellant and seizure of the contraband articles sent to superior immediately after registering the case - All the necessary information to be submitted in a report was sent - Amounts to substantial compliance of the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 52, 57 -- Provisions are not mandatory in nature...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42, 50, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 43, 46 -- Private person - Can arrest an accused and produce before a Police Officer - Provisions of NDPS Act are supplemental to the provisions of Cr.P.C. and not derogatory to them...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, 18 -- Opium - Search made in presence of DSP - No violation of S.50 - There is no requirement that Gazetted Officer should not be of Police Department...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 25, 15 -- Poppy husk - Recovery from a truck - Prosecution of owner of truck - No evidence that owner of truck knowingly permitted the use of truck for transportation of poppy husk as required u/s 25 - Conviction set aside...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 25, 15 -- Poppy husk - Recovery from a truck - Truck remained parked at barrier for 5 days - Sufficient evidence not brought on record to show that no one tampered with truck during said period - Possibility of bags of poppy husk having been loaded in the truck could not be ruled out...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15, 25 -- Charge u/s 15 of the Act - Charge altered to S.25 after close of prosecution evidence as well as defence and after hearing the arguments - Prosecution failed to examine a person in whose presence recovery was effected - It is a serious infirmity - Accused acquitted inter alia on this ground...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50 -- Search in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate - Accused not apprised of his right - Accused was told that if he wished, his search would be taken in the presence of any person known to him but he declined - Conviction quashed...........

Showing : 5231-5240 of 5374 Results