LawMirror.com

Results of plot

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 521-530 of 1011 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Interest Act, 1978, Section 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 34 -- Housing - Plot allotment - Interest rate - Charging on additional amount - Nothing in agreement which provides for rate of interest to be levied on the additional price on account of enhancement of acquisition cost - It has to be in keeping with..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Stamp Act, 1899, Section 2(1), 2(12), 3, 17, 47A(1) -- Stamp duty - Plot allotment in the year 2002 and sale deed presented for registration in the year 2006 - Stamp duty is payable on market value of property on date of registration of sale deed and not on consideration set out in instrument...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(ii) -- Consumer - Plot allotment - Oustees scheme - Petitioners received compensation for the acquired land - Allotment of residential plot under the oustees scheme is made as a gesture of goodwill - No element of 'hiring of service for consideration' of the respondent authority by the petitioners involved in such allotment -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Plot allotment - Paper possession - Extension fee - For non completion of construction - Absence of any document to show that OP - HUDA had indeed sent an offer of possession of the plot to the petitioner - complainant under its memo dated 29.12.1995 - There does not appear to be any valid reason for..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 133, 137 -- Public nuisance - Proof - Revisionist is obstructing natural flow of water by making a ridge over Plot - Inquiry report of Tahasildar also reveals that there is a siphon in canal for free flow of excess water - Petitioner has blocked flow of water by putting a ridge on plot - Previously, petitioner blocked water flow by..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14, 16, 12, 226 -- Resumption of allotted industrial plot - Validity of said order - Letter of allotment issued on 10.1.2001 but actual possession, however, handed over almost after 2 years - Corporation took more than 1 year to grant permission for construction after filing of application - Later on, notice of resumption given and plot..........

ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Appellant cancelled the plot issuing letter dated 16.4.2002 - The cause of action arose to file complaint arose on that date - Complaint filed in the year 2006 held to be barred by time and liable to be dismissed...........

ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Housing -- Plot allotment - Cancellation of plot - Due to laches of the complainant in not enlightening OPs in respect of earlier deposit of instalment dues and in not responding to the letters/notices - Complainant lost chance to demand that aforesaid plot - The said plot not available now and the price of plot in the said locality is comparatively much high - District..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Housing -- Refund of deposit - Relief - Since the OP had not been able to carry out the development work in the area District Forum allowed refund of deposit with 12% p.a. - Order not assailed by complainant and qua him order became final - Order of District Forum challenged by OP by filing appeal in which application filed by complainant requesting forgoing relief granted..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Plot allotment - Delay of three years in providing amenities - Relief given on non construction fee penalty - Respondent is also responsible for delay - Compensation of Rs. 25,000/ - awarded by the State Commission held not justified...........

Showing : 521-530 of 1011 Results