LawMirror.com

Results of 1+of+rule+8+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5641-5650 of 7693 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2) -- Impleadment as party - Suit for perpetual injunction - Petitioner claiming interest in property by virtue of sale transfer pendente lite - Petitioners had not chosen to come on record during pendency of suit or even subsequent to filing of appeal - After sufficient lapse of time application for impleadment was filed -..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Defendant proceeded exparte - Application by daughters that they are necessary parties as whereabouts of their father is not known - Lower Court observed that since a period of seven years had not elapsed therefore there is no presumption that he had died - Order set..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 1 -- Local Commissioner to record evidence of a witness - Before appointing a Commissioner, Court to ensure (i) filing of examination-in-chief in the form of an affidavit with a copy to the opposite party; (ii) Immediately thereupon Court to resolve questions as regards the proof..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 1 -- Title suit on the basis of sale deed - Specific denial by defendant - Execution of sale deed itself in dispute - Issue regarding execution of sale deed - Court ought to frame the issue regarding proof of execution of sale deed...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 16 -- Telegraph - Tree Felling compensation - Determination - Procedure of - Non impleadment of necessary parties - Objection as to - Cannot be raised by party once it has taken chance by filing written statement and having lost before District Judge...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 16 -- Telegraph Department cutting and felling trees - Damage and compensation regarding the same determination procedure - Non-impleadment of necessary parties - Objection as to - Cannot be raised by party once it has taken chance by filing written statement and having lost before District Judge...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 11(1)(2) -- Bombay Amendment as introduced in Maharashtra by Notification dated 5-9-1983 - Wilful disobedience of order of injunction - Application seeking striking of defence - Refusal to strike out defence - Sufficient cause - Failure by defendant to pay royalty amount as per directions of Court - Defendant having failed in all..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 11(1) -- Bombay Amendment as introduced in Maharashtra by Notification dated 5-9-1983 - Injunction order - Wilful disobedience of by the party - Courses open to the Court - Parties defying orders of Court - Committing breach of undertaking given to Court - Consequential dismissal of suit of plaintiff or striking off defence of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 4, Rule 1 -- Suit instituted after office hours or on a holiday at the residence of Presiding Officer - No Judicial Officer would refuse to exercise his discretion in a case of urgency justifying the grant of appropriate relief in the form of injunction or stay order in appropriate case...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 1 -- Adjournment - Not to be granted more than three times during hearings of suit - Even these three adjournments cannot be claimed as of right as adjournment is in the discretion of the Court and cannot be claimed as of right...........

Showing : 5641-5650 of 7693 Results