Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37 -- Instructions issued by Director of Land Records Haryana vide Letter No. 5498 dated 15.5.1992, in view of Haryana Amendment Act 9 of 1992-Mutation sanctioned of Shamlat Deh land in favour of Gram Panchayat-Haryana Amendment Act 9 of 1992 declared ultra vires by Division Bench in Jai Singh's case 1995 PLJ 83-Order..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37 -- Mutation of change of ownership on the basis of Civil Court decree - Compromise decree presented to Revenue functionaries after 7 years and that too after death of judgment - debtor - No explanation as to why two earlier compromise decrees not presented for attestation of mutation regarding change of ownership - Highly..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37 -- Mutation of inheritance - Claim based on compromise decree of 7 years earlier regarding change of ownership presented after death of owner - To be ignored - Alleged registered Will - Not propounded - Mutation of inheritance should be sanctioned in favour of all the natural heirs...........
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 41 -- Title of vendor - When vendor has only partial interest in the property and disposed of property greater than what he really has - Vendee is to establish and prove that he took reasonable care and made full enquiry about the title of the property purchased - Mutation entry in the name of the vendor does not dispense with duty..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37 -- Mutation, sanction of-Not correct that Assistant Collector IInd Grade not competent to sanction mutation-Mutation is part of the records-Under Chapter IV Patwari is to make entries in the manner provided therein and a Revenue Officer is competent to sanction/attest the mutation-Nowhere provided that only Assistant..........
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 8 -- Not correct that benefit of exemption cannot be given as application filed after a lapse of 9 years of death of landowner-Heirs of landowner in 1977 filed application claiming exemption as surplus area of landowner not utilised during lifetime of landowner, the heirs being small landowners entitled to retain land..........
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42 -- Application for correction of consolidation record showing land to be in ownership of Gram Panchayat, the particular Khewat in possession of applicants since long and in Jamabandi shown as Shamilat Deh and Consolidation Authorities committed a mistake by showing the area in the..........
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42 -- Correction of entries showing land in ownership of Gram Panchayat to that of Khewatdars - For Gram Panchayat in the first instance to prove that land vests in it on account of the provisions of Section 2(g) Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act-Onus would thereafter shift..........
Injunction -- Cannot be issued against true owner - In the instant case re-spondents in possession of property since 1947 and got mutation in their name - Appellants though acquired right in the property by succession but they them-selves had purchased some properties from respondents - Under such circumstances injunction granted against appellants was not liable to be..........
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42 -- Additional Director Consolidation ordered change of mutation entries in revenue record and distribution of land amongst right - holders - Land recorded in Jamabandi as 'Shamlat Deh Hasab Rasad Raqba Khewat' prior to consolidation proceedings as also after consolidation - Question..........
