Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(o), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Act, 1956, Section 13,14 -- Service - Complaint - Maintainability against All India Institute for Medical Sciences - Apart from registration fee, institution recovers various amounts such as hospital charges, diagnostic charges etc. from the patients - It would be difficult to hold..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(o) -- `Service' - Service rendered at government hospital/health centre/dispensary - Where no charge whatsoever is made from any person or availing of the services and all patients are given free service it is outside the purview of the expression `service' as, defined in section 2(1) (o) of the Act - The payment of a token..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(o) -- `Service' - Service rendered in government hospital/health centre/dispensary - Where services are rendered on payment of charges and also rendered free of charge to other persons availing of such services it would fall within the ambit of the expression service as defined in Section 2 (1) (o) of the Act...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 80 -- Notice - Sent as per registered post - Unrebutted statement of plaintiff to same effect - Service of notice held, proved...........
Criminal trial -- Plea of alibi - Plea that accused was at his service place - Duty Certificate marked for 'identification' but was never exhibited - On the other hand all the eye witnesses claimed to have seen the accused actively participating in the occurrence - Defence thus produced meagre and unsatisfactory evidence in support of plea of alibi and can be termed to be..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2),(b) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Purchase of Mahindra jeep from Jabalpur in (M.P.) - Deficiency in service alleged and complaint filed before Varansi District Forum - There are more than one opposite parties with their addresses of different places - They are also carrying on business as per the own mention of the complainant..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - The vehicle in question purchased on 7.9.1994 - Its certain defects were pointed out in 1994 itself within the period of 45 days and then a written complaint was made in the year 1997 - At no point of time, the appellant stated that there was no deficiency in service - Held that being so the cause of action finally..........
Housing -- Flat allotment - Deficiency in service - Complainants were themselves responsible for default in payment - No deficiency in service or unfair trade practice proved against O.P. - Complaint dismissed...........
Tyres -- Allegation in the complainant remained unrebutted and the same having been supported by the affidavit of responsible officer of the complainant - Deficiency of service on the part of OP held proved...........
Indian Electricity Act, 1910, Section 26(6),14(e) -- Electricity meter - Defective metre - Inflated bills - Compensation - Contention that metre running fast consuming more than the actual consumption - Held that complainant complied with clause 14(e) of serving a notice on the respondent of his intention of getting the metre tested as per provision of section 26(6) of..........
