LawMirror.com

Results of 1+of+rule+8+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5801-5810 of 7693 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Application can be filed only by a party to the lis - Review application is not maintainable at the instance of a third party...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Fraud - Order obtained by practising fraud - Court has always power to recall its order vitiated by fraud - When order of injunction to restrain authority from proceeding with formation of layout on acquired land and allotment of sites to applicants, was obtained by misrepresenting facts, Court has inherent power..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 1, 3, A.P. Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956, Section 11(3), 6(3) -- Suit for different causes of action - Single suit for different causes of action can be filed - However plaintiff is to pay Court Fees separately for relief claimed under different causes of action...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 10 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for specific performance - Impleading of subsequent purchaser - Plaintiff sought a decree against defendant and subsequent purchaser for declaration that subsequent Memorandum of understanding between them was illegal - No question of subsequent purchaser not a..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2) -- Plaint - Amendment - Suit for specific performance - Amendment of plaint to implead subsequent purchaser and also decree for declaration that subsequent agreement was illegal - Amendment was a necessary consequence of the defendant and subsequent purchaser's conduct - There was..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 9(1), 9(3) -- Service of summons - Court cannot order service of summons under R.9(3) also in addition to and simultaneously to the service of summons under R.9(1) of Order 5 CPC...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197(1) -- Sanction for prosecution - There should be nexus between the acts alleged and the discharge of official duties for requirement of sanction...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 1 -- Pleadings - Plaintiff is bound by its own pleadings and he must fail or succeed on his own pleadings...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1(4) -- Formal defect - Petition allowed to be withdrawn - Grant of liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action has to be inferred...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 91(1) -- Injunction - Construction of building in violation of Municipal Regulations - Single individual can file a suit for injunction to restrain the wrongdoer from proceeding such an illegal act - Suit does not come under S.91(1) CPC...........

Showing : 5801-5810 of 7693 Results