LawMirror.com

Results of lost+of+document

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 581-590 of 732 Results

JHARKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RANCHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),(g),14(1),(d) -- Student - Examination - Consumer - Deficiency in service - Non publishing of result for four years despite the complainant fulfilling all the requirements as desired by the University - Complainant could not seek admission to Post Graduate course and lost four valuable years - Held it amounts to deficiency in..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Insurance claim -- Loss of ornaments in robbery - Repudiation on the basis of police action and Surveyor's report though the value of lost Jewellery assessed at Rs. 28,137/- by the Surveyor - Claim decreed by the District Forum for Rs.30,000/- - Held that appellant liable to pay the claim as assessed by the Surveyor - The payment will be paid interest @9% from the date of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Generally not to be disallowed except - (i) where a time barred claim sought to be introduced, or (ii) where it changes the nature of suit itself, or (Hi) it is mala fide, or (iv) the other party cannot be placed in the same position had the plaint been originally filed correctly i.e. the other side has..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, 151, Order 8, Rule 1, 10 -- Written statement - To be filed within 30 days of service of summons - Court can extend time for valid reasons - Extended time cannot go beyond 90 days from date of service of summons - Right of party to file written statement is lost if same is not filed within time allowed - Court has no discretionary..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 84, 302 -- Murder - Plea of insanity - After arrest accused dashed his head against iron bars of prison and a case was registered but the plea of insanity was rejected - Plea of insanity negatived on the ground (1) Accused entered into place of incident concealing the axe under his clothes and after inflicting injury on the head he fled..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Annual confidential report -- Adverse remarks - Communication of - The aim, object and purpose of communicating adverse remarks is to give an opportunity to the officer concerned to improve his performance - In said context it can be compared to an advice - Purpose is lost if there is a delayed communication...........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g) -- Indira Vikas Patra Rules, 1986, Rules 7,8 and 11 - Indira Vikas Patra - Maturity amount not paid in terms of rule 7 and 8 of the Rules as the Patras had been lost by complainant and he could not present the same - Rule 11 provided for relaxing the requirement of any provisions in the rules which causes undue hardship to..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 1 -- Withdrawal of suit - Unconditional withdrawal of suit - Claim which could have been claimed but not claimed, stands relinquished as lost claim and plaintiff cannot file a second suit for such claims...........

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Post Office Act, 1898, Section 6,48 -- Money order - Amount not received by the payee even after 4 months from the date of money order - Plea that due to technical fault they were lost and the remitter received the money under duplicate money order sent subsequently. Plea that appellant - OP exempt from liability u/s of the..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Carriage by Air Act, 1972, Schedule II, rule 22 and 25 - Damages - Complainant did not make any averment about the damage caused by any willful misconduct of the carrier which is requirement of Rule 25 - Liability of the Airlines would be under Rule 22 confined to the maximum damage to be valued @ 20 US $ per kg...........

Showing : 581-590 of 732 Results