LawMirror.com

Results of consumer defect

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 51-60 of 167 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 2(1)(g) , 2(1)(r) , 14(1)(d) -- Seeds - Defective seeds - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Paddy seeds - Giving less than 80% yield of the representation made by dealer - Report produced by complainant of the Assistant Director of Agriculture which stated that the complainant could not get the regular yield because of..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 2(1)(r) , 13 , 14(1)(d) -- Jewellery - Defective jewellery - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Gold ring found to be of 20 carats instead of 23 carats as represented by respondent OP - Held to be a clear cut defect in the gold ring sold to the consumer - Respondent jeweller has resorted to unfair trade practice -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Tractor -- Manufacturing defect - Compensation - After filing a consumer complaint, complainant - respondent simply abandoned their new tractor for six long years at the premises of the same dealer against which they filed the complaint without bothering to pay the repair charges or to enquire if they could get the tractor released after a smaller payment - They did not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Truck - Manufacturing defect - Allegations by complainant - Unauthorised altering of the specifications of important electro - mechanical parts of a registered motor vehicle is against the provisions of the MV Act, 1988, Chapter VII and VIII and the rules framed thereunder - Such acts are..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Scooter -- Manufacturing defect - The two wheeler had done just about 300 kms. running after nearly ten months of its purchase - The vehicle was still within warranty period of one year - Repeated servicing and repairs turned out to be unsuccessful in resolving the problems encountered by the consumer - complainant - It would point to some serious defect, if not a..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 14(1)(d) -- Auto Rickshaw - Defect - Engine defective - Manufacturing defect - Necessary party - Only on account of the fact that the manufacturer was not impleaded the complaint cannot be thrown out...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 21(b) -- Car - Defective car - Concurrent findings - There was no expert evidence to prove that the vehicle has got any defect - Only minor repairs were carried out and it has not been proved that there was any inherent or latent defect in the engine - The concurrent findings of two Fora below - No case made out by the..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Motor vehicle - Defect in vehicle - The complainant has not produced any records to show that he has complied with the warranty conditions - Further the complainant has not produced a report of any independent surveyor or engineer to prove the existence of any manufacturing defect - Complainant did not send the vehicle for..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Machine - Defect during warranty period - Held that even if the machinery is sold for commercial purpose the purchaser will be consumer under Section 2(1)(d) during the period of warranty...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Defect - Machine defective - Machine used for 10 months when it was seized by bank - Order of refund of the entire cost against appellant could have been passed only subject to return of machine - Order qua appellant modified with direction to the appellant to pay Rs. 4.00 lakh as compensation to respondent No. 1...........

Showing : 51-60 of 167 Results