Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12 -- Complaint maintainability - Plot allotment - Non completion of construction - Non construction fee - Raising of demand by appellant/OP Improvement Trust - Held that the Fora under the CP Act have no jurisdiction to decide the correctness of the composition fee/non - construction fee etc. - Impugned order of the District Forum..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e) -- Consumer dispute - Plot/site - Auction purchase - Extension fee - Jurisdiction - The Consumer Forum has no jurisdiction to go into the correctness of demand of extension fee - It cannot be decided in the complaint filed by the complainant...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 13(1)(c), 14(1)(d) -- Spurious soft drink - Absence of test report - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Two bottles of soft drink produced before the Commission wherein in one bottle there appears a housefly lying in it which is visible with naked eye - Other bottle also has a foreign object - Finding returned by..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(1)(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Complaint - Dismissal for want of prosecution - Application by respondent that the Counsel wrongly noted the date as 2.3.2010 instead of 24.2.2010 - District Forum in its wisdom restored the complaint which was dismissed for want of prosecution - Order not interfered with in revision...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 3, 14(1)(d), Banking service -- Bank locker - Burglary - Criminal case - Deficiency in service - Complaint maintainability - Held that the Consumer Forum has jurisdiction, even if a criminal case is pending before the criminal Court, as reliefs sought are different in nature and the relief which could be granted by the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material facts - Complaint maintainability - The complainant not only misrepresented but also gave a mis-description of the value of plant and the building in order to obtain benefits available under IAR policy - The nondisclosure or misdescription of the facts particularly..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material facts - Complaint maintainability - The complainant not only misrepresented but also gave a mis-description of the value of plant and the building in order to obtain benefits available under IAR policy - The nondisclosure or misdescription of the facts particularly..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11 -- Territorial jurisdiction - Plea that the dispute falls within the territorial jurisdiction of District Forum X whereas respondent-complainant has chosen to file the complaint before District Forum No.VI repelled - Order of the District Forum dismissing application by observing that entire Delhi is one unit upheld - Since Delhi..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Plea that the vehicle in question purchased in District 'M' and complaint maintainable before District Forum 'M' and not before District Forum 'B' repelled - Complainant specifically pleaded that the vehicle after purchase was got finance from Bank at 'B' and registered with the Registering and..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Vehicle finance - Service of finance obtained by the respondent-complainant for purchase of two trucks - There is no material to suggest that trucks were purchased by the complainant for earning livelihood by self-employment - The District Forum erred in considering the complainant to be a..........
