LawMirror.com

Results of suit for title

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 51-60 of 1707 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for declaration of title and eviction - First Appellate Court held that plaintiff has failed to establish his title and possession over suit properties and plaintiff is not entitled to get decree of declaration of right, title, interest over suit properties and he is also not entitled to get decree of recovery..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Practice and Procedure -- SCC suit - Title of parties cannot be decided in a SCC suit and only relationship of landlord and tenant is to be seen between parties...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Easements Act, 1882, Section 15 -- Easement - Right of pathway - Plaintiff claims that he was in continuous use of common road for over four decades - However, plaintiff failed to establish such right of way was acquired by him by prescription or grant or by necessity - Moreover, plaintiff has laid suit seeking relief of declaration in `B' Schedule property and for..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 3 -- Misdescription of property - It is a fundamental defect rendering suit not maintainable - Court cannot enter into merits of case after holding of misdescription of property - First Appellate Court rightly held that observations of trial Court regarding title and possession of either of the parties would not operate as res..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Mutation -- Law as to - (a) Mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of parties over land involved is not decided; (b) Mutation order or revenue entries are only for fiscal purposes to enable State to collect revenue from person recorded; (c) They neither extinguish nor create title; (d) mutation in revenue records does not have any presumptive value on..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Hindu law -- Self acquired property - Plaintiff contended that suit property was purchased in the name of defendant no.2 as Benamidar by his father out of joint family fund - However, he has not been able to even produce certified copy of sale deed nor he has ever challenged legality of said sale deed - Plaintiff has not brought on record as to how fund was collected,..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 34 -- Suit for injunction simplicitor - Maintainability - Defendants specifically denied the title of plaintiff and her possession over suit property - When matter involves complicated questions of fact and law relating to title, Court will relegate parties to remedy by way of comprehensive suit for declaration of title instead of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and injunction - Defendant contended that suit property was allotted to his father in partition, but he has not produced any document to show that suit property was ancestral property - Plaintiffs on the other hand proved their right and title based on Assignment Order in respect of suit property - They have..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendants from dispossessing plaintiff or alienating or encumbering suit property - Defendants have disputed marital status of plaintiff with their deceased son and have categorically denied her claim over property or her possession thereof - Validity of marriage becomes a question of..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Will -- Declaring Will "dubious" at interlocutory stage of deciding application for interim injunction - Trial Court ventured into midst of document, effectively prejudging an issue that ought to be tried in full evidence - This amounts to a jurisdictional error, as Courts dealing with interlocutory reliefs must confine themselves to assessing i.e prima facie case,..........

Showing : 51-60 of 1707 Results