LawMirror.com

Results of evidence say

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 601-610 of 28891 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 21 -- Summoning of opponent as a witness - Not desirable judiciously - However, in case Court comes to conclusion that opponent's evidence is necessary then to summon the opponent as a witness...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 10, 6 -- Aggravated sexual assault - PW1 is eye witness and res-gestae witness - Therefore, evidence of PW1 is sufficient for case of prosecution - PW1 has stated that when she entered the house, she had seen accused laying on victim child - But, at that moment she could not have noticed specifically that..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 284, 285 -- Video conferencing - Recording of evidence - Witnesses are living in USA - Use of video conferencing for recording of evidence is no longer an exception but a recognized and judicially endorsed norm - Mere fact that respondents have alleged mala fide intent on part of petitioners based on pending criminal case and absence..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint by proprietorship concern - Where no evidence was led to prove that complainant was owner of a proprietorship concern, he cannot be called to be a payee or holder in due course - Complainant thus, not entitled to file complaint u/s 138 of the Act...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence at appellate stage - Documents in question are all post suit documents and are all Xerox copies - Reasons accorded for production of additional evidence do not meet the requirements of O.41.R.27 CPC - Application rejected...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 391, 401 -- Offence u/Ss.420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC - Additional evidence at revision stage - Judgment of District Collector - Applicant had filed complaint before District Collector and was aware that judgment had been delivered by District Collector, therefore, applicant..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 468, 201, 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 162 -- Offence/Ss. 467, 468, 201, 120-B IPC - Acquittal - Statement of co-accused - Only evidence available against accused is statement made by co-accused before police - However, such statement is inadmissible as per S.162 Cr.P.C, therefore it is impermissible to rely upon..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Defendant admitted signature found in reply notice but denied signature in agreements to sell as well as on summons - He contends that signatures were forcefully taken but same was not explained by defendant by placing cogent evidence - Moreover, endorsement at the document clearly discloses that even after execution of sale..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ia) -- Divorce - Cruelty - Husband has placed sufficient evidence on record to establish sustained cruel pattern of behaviour on the part of wife, where she has used abusive language and misbehaved with husband - Wife addressed husband as impotent person having stinking body and she always used to utter that she found it shameful..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Will -- Declaring Will "dubious" at interlocutory stage of deciding application for interim injunction - Trial Court ventured into midst of document, effectively prejudging an issue that ought to be tried in full evidence - This amounts to a jurisdictional error, as Courts dealing with interlocutory reliefs must confine themselves to assessing i.e prima facie case,..........

Showing : 601-610 of 28891 Results