LawMirror.com

Results of order+18+rule+5+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 6141-6150 of 11027 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Criminal proceedings - Quashing of - Petitioners alleged to have physically evicted complainant-encroacher from temple premises pursuant to order for eviction - Held, taking steps for physically evicting respondent is not an offence since it is in accordance with provisions of the Endowments Act - Further, there is a..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 441, 445 -- Release of accused on bail - State Govt. passed Notification containing direction that verification of sureties should be done by Tehsildar - Procedure of verification of sureties by Tehsildar consuming long time, thereby resulting in delay of release of accused from jail, though given concession of bail - Held, Magistrate..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 50, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 -- Sale of adulterated Paneer - Appeal against acquittal - PW1 never stated before Court that seized Paneer was meant for sale to public - Report of Public Analyst showing fat contents to be 40.45% whereas report of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 10, Rule 1A -- Non-appearance of both plaintiffs and defendants - Dismissal of suit without recording any reason - Legality of - Held, in terms of O.10.R.1-A CPC, Court is required to direct parties to appear in person after recording admissions and denials U.O.10.R.1 CPC to opt for either mode of settlement outside Court - Provisions have..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164 -- Confession - Principles governing - (i) The provisions of Section 164 Cr.P.C. must be complied with not only in form, but in essence; (ii) Before proceeding to record the confessional statement, a searching enquiry must be made from the accused as to the custody from which he was produced and the treatment he had been receiving..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 60(1)(c) -- Execution proceedings - Attachment of property - Exemption to agricultural labourers - Held, executing court held that judgment-debtor admitted that he is a tailor and that he is not entitled to benefits of S.60(1)(c) CPC - This is neither patently nor evident on record - Held, patently, the judgment-debtor is an agricultural..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256 -- Dishonour of cheque - Absence of complainant - Dismissal of claim - Legality of - Held, Magistrate has to exercise power u/s 256 of Cr.P.C., only when presence of complainant was imminent - As far as this case is concerned, there was no complainant since he was dead - Magistrate..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227 -- Complainant allegedly suffered lacerated wound on right side of his forehead, suffered dislocation of his shoulders apart from blunt injuries which were grievous in nature - Weapon of offence used cricket wicket which could have caused death - Evidence of past history of enmity between parties - Held, it is not a case of grave..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, Section 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 420 -- Quashing of order sought vide which cognizance of offence taken u/s 21 of MMDR Act, 1957 and u/s 420 and 467 of IPC - Allegations that challan earlier issued by Mining Department for transportation of iron ore were..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, 92 -- Execution sale - Application to set aside sale - Not pressed - Effect of - Held, as per R.92 unless an application made u/r 89 or 90 or 91 is disallowed, Court shall not make an order confirming the sale - Said rule nowhere mentions the fate of an application which has not been pressed - Hence, Court has to first decide..........

Showing : 6141-6150 of 11027 Results