Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of title and injunction - Burden of proof - Title of plaintiff is proved on record by plaintiff - High Court referred to multiple piece of evidence, orders and documents and string them together to come to a clear conclusion that title subsists in plaintiff - High Court did not solely rely on lack of..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession - Plaintiff purchased the suit properties by registered sale deed - He thus, categorically proved his case as regarding title of suit property - In so far as possession is concerned, though defendant was put in possession on basis of agreement of sell but since he failed to..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title - Without seeking consequential relief of possession - Suit filed by plaintiff is not merely for declaration but consequential relief including suit for permanent injunction and damages has been sought - It is thus, wrong to allege that it is a suit for mere declaration without consequential relief..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 31, 34 -- Suit for cancellation of sale deed - Where suit is filed by executants for annulment/cancellation of registered instrument, such suits are governed by S.31 of the Act - However, if a non-executant wishes to claim that instrument is bad due to any other reason, then he is required to file a suit for grant of a decree of..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title - In a dispute with respect to determination of title, merely pointing out the lacunae in the defendant's title would not suffice - In such a suit, burden of proof rests on the shoulders of plaintiff to reasonably establish the probability of better title...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction - Plaintiff led in evidence records of rights in an attempt to establish his title - Such records would not counter the proof of occupancy rights furnished by defendant - Plaintiff failed to produce a single document of title in respect of suit property - Burden of proof..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 34 -- Suit for permanent injunction simpliciter without seeking relief of declaration - When in a suit for perpetual injunction based on title, defendant pleads perfection of his title by adverse possession against plaintiff or his predecessor, plaintiff need not claim a declaration of title, as there was no cloud on title of..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction - Plea of non est factum - Plaintiffs claimed to be absolute owners thereby denying not only correctness of Power of Attorney in favour of defendant but also subsequent execution of sale deeds by Attorney - Defendant transferred the property in favour of his father and..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration that sale deed is null and void - Suit is not maintainable without seeking possession, when plaintiff is not in possession...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38, Power of Attorney Act, 1882, Section 2, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 208 -- Execution of sale deed by power of attorney holder - Plea that power of attorney was cancelled - It is to be proved not only that power of attorney was cancelled but it was also intimated - It is not proved that cancellation of power of attorney was..........
