Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, 5 -- Exclusion of time is different and cannot be equated with condonation of delay - Period once excluded, cannot be counted for the purpose of computing period for which delay can be condoned...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 14 -- Condonation of delay - Writ petition not entertained on the ground that appellant should approach Appellate Authority - Bona fides of appellant in filing writ petition not challenged - Appeal filed immediately after dismissal of writ petition - On exclusion of said period, appeal would be within condonable period - Delay condoned -..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 3A -- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Cannot be claimed as a matter of right and only on genuine reasons, delay is to be condoned and not otherwise...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay condoned - Delay not to be taken into consideration to decide the petition on merits...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 10 years 8 months in filing appeal - Appellate Court condoned the delay without giving notice to plaintiff and without hearing him - Proper procedure for appellate Court to not admit condonation application but to keep it pending and issue a notice upon other side to..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 756 days in filing revision against rejection of application u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C - No sufficient explanation given for delay - Complete careless and reckless long delay found on the part of petitioner - Delay not condoned - Application for condonation of delay rejected...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Substitution of Legal heirs - Death of plaintiff no.1 - Condonation of delay - Matter was referred to meditation which could not be settled - Respondents being heirs of deceased plaintiff no.1 would be entitled to benefit of result of suit - It is not relevant whether they were parties to..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 2 years 29 days in filing application to restore suit dismissed in default - Plaintiffs were not informed by advocate representing them about dismissal of suit - Immediately on coming to know about such dismissal of suit, plaintiffs acted upon and filed necessary application - Delay condoned subject to cost..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 546 days in filing appeal - Unaware of disposal of suit for a long period of 2 years does not amount to sufficient cause - Negligent attitude on the part of petitioner in pursuing the matter during course of trial proceedings in the suit as well as in preferring appeal is borne by record - Delay not..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Uncondonable delay cannot be condoned in a routine manner - Condonation of delay is an exception - Exceptions are to be exercised discreetly, if reasons furnished are genuine and acceptable...........
