LawMirror.com

Results of hearsay+evidence

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 61-70 of 114 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 -- Oral dying declaration - To the rule of inadmissibility of hearsay evidence, oral dying declaration is an exception...........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance - Entitlement to - Respondent contracted second marriage during subsistence of first marriage due to which wife left matrimonial home - Claim of maintenance has been preferred after 19 years - That was supported by her daughter, who was at relevant point of time aged about 11-12 years - Respondent's plea that..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 391 -- Dacoity - Proof - There is no mention in FIR about presence of PW10 - It was specifically mentioned in FIR that wife of informant was present but she has not been examined - PW12, father of informant is a hearsay witness - PW11, doctor has supported factum of death of informant by explosive injuries - I.O. has said that he found sign..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 -- Dying declaration - Statement recorded by Reader of SDM - Reader put the questions to deceased - Statement was read out to the deceased by Reader - SDM was only a listener to the questions put by Reader to the deceased - Held, deposition of SDM in respect of that statement is only a hearsay evidence and is inadmissible...........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, TAMIL NADU

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance upon..........

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance upon..........

TAMIL NADU CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MADRAS

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 -- Dying declaration - Evidentiary value - Held, dying declaration is a hearsay evidence and is an exception to general rule of evidence - Principle of dying declaration is based on legal maxim "nemo moriturus proesumitur mentin" - a man will not meet his maker with a lie in his mouth - In present case, evidence relating to dying declaration..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 60 -- Hearsay evidence - Witness no where stated in his statement that he disclosed incident to any other witness - Therefore, evidence of other witness cannot be taken into consideration being not eye-witnesses, only hearsay witnesses and that also not confined by person from whom they allegedly heard incident, which is necessary as per law...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 60, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 293(1) -- Death by poisoning - Report of Chemical Examiner - Neither expert examined nor his report exhibited - Procedure u/s 293(1) Cr.P.C. not followed - Opinion of doctor that death was due to poisoning - Hit by rule of hearsay in absence of marking chemical examiner's report...........

Showing : 61-70 of 114 Results