LawMirror.com

Results of mutation of land

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 61-70 of 367 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Record of rights -- Entering name - Applicant has to be a holder, occupant, owner, mortgagee or tenant - Such a right is also available to a person acquiring interest in the property by succession, survivorship, inheritance, partition, purchase mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise - Merely a holder or occupant does not meet the requirements of law for exercising such a..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Family settlement - - Can be even oral in which case no registration is necessary - Family settlement can also be established by conduct of parties - Conduct of acquiescence to the continued possession of petitioners over the land is certainly in the honour of family settlement - Family settlement persisting between parties till the day - In view of family settlement..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Mutation -- Mutation entries do not convey or extinguish any title and those entries are relevant only for the purpose of collection of land revenue...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Conviction for - Challenge against - Authority demanding money for mutation of name of complainant in land revenue records - Complainant through evidence clearly establishing twin requirement of demand of money and acceptance of same - Complainant through evidence established that ten..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 120B -- Cheating - Allegation that accused persons committed offence of cheating with the help of forged Will for purposes of mutation of land belonging to husband of complainant - No certified copy or original proceedings of Revenue case ever produced or used as evidence before Trial Court - No evidence on record that..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Judgment alleged to operate as res judicata is not available on record - Moreover judgment passed in mutation proceedings u/s 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act are summary proceedings and is not binding upon the parties in regular title proceedings...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 21(3) -- Mutation - Correction of - Assistant Director passed an order whereby some part of land was excluded from area allotted to petitioner and some area was included in holding of petitioner - Said order was challenged by respondent No.3 before Additional Director - Impugned order..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 166, 167, 463, 464, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Quashing of FIR - Petitioner, Sub-Divisional Officer, exercising jurisdiction under Rajasthan Tenancy Act and Land Revenue Act alleged to have conspired with other accused persons and got mutation in name of plaintiff for wrongful gains - No allegations made in FIR that..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g), 4 -- Shamilat deh - Mutation in the name of Municipal Council - Objections of proprietors of village - Held, plaintiffs who claimed to be proprietors of village could not have objections to a mutation in the name of Municipal Council in relation to shamilat deh by alleged fact that they were proprietors of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 13A -- Mutation - Title - Issue of ownership had already been decided in favour of Gram Panchayat - Mutation wrongly entered in favour of right holders - Held, merely because a wrong entry had been mutated in favour of right holders would not give them any right to contend that subsequently they had a right in..........

Showing : 61-70 of 367 Results