LawMirror.com

Results of sick

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 61-70 of 110 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22A -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Declared a sick company by Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction - Thereafter company making purchases and issuing cheque without disclosing that company is declared sick - Cheque dishonoured - Complaint cannot be..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22A -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued by Govt. company - BIFR declared the company sick - No impediment in initiating proceedings u/s 138 of the Act against company or its Directors...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22 -- Suit for recovery of money against sick company - Maintainability - Recovery of electricity bill on account of non-payment is not protected u/s.22 of the Act - Suit u/s.22 of the Act held, not maintainable...........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 2(1)(r) , 3, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22 -- Additional remedy - Deficiency in service - Debentures - Non payment of maturity amount - Company registered with BIFR - Plea that assets cannot be disposed off to make any payment and proceedings should be stayed u/s 22 of the SICA, 1985..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(b),2(1),(g), Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22(1) -- Fixed deposit - Company became sick - Plea that complaint not maintainable as the proceedings qua the respondent are pending repelled - Held that suit for recovery of money in respect of any loan or advance granted to the industrial company..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(b),2(1),(g), Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22(1) -- Fixed deposit - interest - Sick company - Matter pending before the BIFR - Company Law Board has also finalised a scheme for repayment of the deposited amount - As per scheme respondent is required to pay interest @ 14% p.a...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 22 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company declared sick by BIFR - Held, S.22 of SICA does not create any legal impediment for instituting and proceeding with a criminal case u/s 138 of the Act - Summoning order upheld...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 14, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 195, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 193, 196, 228 -- Board or Appellate Authority under S.14 of Sick Industrial Companies Act shall be deemed to be a civil Court for the proposes of S.195 Cr.P.C. and every proceeding before the Board or the Appellate Authority..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Section 15, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(cc), 25O -- Mill - Closure - Mill declared as sick company under BIFR whereunder rehabilitation scheme was sanctioned - Orders became final - No possibility of the revival of the mill - Order of BIFR sanctioning scheme and order of Single Judge refusing to permit..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 64 days in filing appeal - Counsel fell sick much after the decision was rendered - Complainant had ample time to get the copy of the order which was issued on 19.01.2005 - Appeal filed on 30.03.2005 - For want of proof of the facts stated in the application it has to..........

Showing : 61-70 of 110 Results