LawMirror.com

Results of civil procedure code o 21

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 731-740 of 1886 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 38 -- Non payment of decretal amount by judgment debtor - Order of arrest - Challenge thereto - Despite lapse of six years, judgment debtor has not chosen to pay even a single rupee by way of discharging the debt - As such, cumulatively if the evidence on record is viewed it is clear that he had means to discharge the decretal..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 11 -- Money decree - Execution - Objection - Petitioner nowhere in his petition u/s 47 stated that the Executing Court has had no jurisdiction or the ground why the decree cannot be executed - Rather he raised the question of only procedural defect - Held, procedural defect itself cannot be a ground for denying the..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 84 -- Auction sale - Deposit of bid amount - Sale-Ameen directed the auctioner-purchaser to deposit 25% of amount on the same day - Despite such direction 25% of amount was neither deposited nor paid - No material on record to substantiate the claim of auctio, purchaser that his offer to deposit/pay the required amount was not..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Order 21, Rule 97, 101 -- Execution - Third party objections - Order passed - It is in the nature of a decree against which appeal and not revision lies...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Order 21, Rule 97, 101 -- Execution - Third party objections - A person that causes obstruction and wants an adjudication that his possession shall not be disturbed, he is bound to establish his title...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35, Easements Act, 1882, Section 13 -- Order for opening of way - Execution of - Entitlement to - Private respondents are the heirs of "J" and "V" who were indeed impleaded as party respondents before High Court - Held, they have locus standi to file the application for execution...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35, Easements Act, 1882, Section 13 -- Order for opening of way - Application for execution - Limitation - Enforceability of the order dated 22.01.1996 was finally pronounced in order dated 15.09.2009 passed by High Court - Application for execution filed on 04.10.2010 - Held, it cannot be considered barred by limitation...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 58, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5, 11, 11A -- Attachment before judgment - Does not cease with passing of the decree - There is no need to seek a fresh attachment of land at the stage of execution of the decree...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 111, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 19, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99 - - Partition suit - Final decree - Execution proceedings - Right of re-entry against tenant - Held, once execution court comes to the conclusion that claimants are indeed lessees it may not be correct or legal for Court to proceed..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 101, 103 -..........

Showing : 731-740 of 1886 Results