LawMirror.com

Results of conviction+suspend

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 7481-7490 of 8376 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Penal Code, 1860, Section 148,458,149,395,302,149 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Appreciation of evidence - Testimony of PW-5 held totally false - The moment this important link of the prosecution story falls on the ground, then the only inference is that the appellants did not hire the services of 'H - and 'B - for the elimination of deceased - Misguided suspicion..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32 -- Dying declaration - Ample opportunity for others to influence the mind of the deceased and statement made contrary to facts available on record - Conviction cannot be recorded on such dying declaration alone...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 148, 149, 304 Part II, 325 -- Appeal against conviction - Injuries by blunt object - Most of injuries simple - No grievous injury on vital part - Grievous injury only on legs or forearms - Death after 7 days - Conviction u/s 304 Part II not justified - PWs.2, 3 and 14 turning hostile - PWs 6 and 7 not present on spot but made as..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, 201, 34 -- Conviction on the basis of last seen together - Giving false explanation of whereabouts of deceased - Having knowledge of dead body of deceased - Recovery at his instance - Co-accused acquitted - Can be convicted u/s 302 and for no other offence - Appeal partly allowed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 328, 452, 34 -- Murder of three and injuries to other members of same family by mob of 60 - Conviction of 13 and acquittal of 47 - Appellant acquitted by trial Court but convicted by High Court - Appellant was seen prominently in the mob trespassing into house of Mohan - He and others challenged the deceased..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 55, 20(b)(ii), 22 -- Recovery of charas - Sample - In absence of positive evidence that sample was taken from the same packet which was seized from possession of accused his conviction cannot be sustained...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2, 7, 16 -- For the purpose of conviction the essential ingredient is sale of the adulterated article to the purchaser by the vendor - Not material to establish the capacity of the person vis-a-vis the owner of the shop to prove his authority to sell the adulterated food exposed for sale - Proviso to S.2(ia)(m) is..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A -- Dowry death - None examined from village of deceased - Grand mother-in-law admitting some bickering between accused and deceased - Uncle of deceased stating that relations between deceased and accused were cordial - PWs. 12, 14, 15 & 16 turning hostile - Mother of deceased altogether denied prosecution story - Testimony of PW 5 of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Criminal trial -- Circumstantial evidence - Dead body recovered from place other than the place indicated by accused in disclosure statement - Conviction set aside. (Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302)..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34 -- Appellant No.2 mother of deceased, poured kerosene and appellant No.1 step father set deceased on fire - PW4 younger sister of deceased, a child witness was eye witness to incident - PW3 police patil recorded statement of deceased wherein she stated that A1 poured kerosene on her and A2 set her on fire - Order of conviction..........

Showing : 7481-7490 of 8376 Results