LawMirror.com

Results of 39+of+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 2276 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7 -- Appointment of Pleader Commissioner - Dispute lies regarding use and utility of suit land either for cultivation purposes or having a school over the same - Petitioner denied claiming that there is no school building - Appointment of Commissioner is the right way to deal with the situation - For deciding an application for..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Both plaintiff and defendant assert possession over suit property - Complex factual and legal issues arise in the case, which can only be thoroughly examined and resolved through a detailed trial - Plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if injunction is not granted - If property was to be alienated,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Claim of plaintiff is based on agreement to sell - Plaintiff was not able to prove prima facie case in his favour - Merely by producing photographs etc. petitioner could not prove his possession over plot in dispute - Defendants produced a number of documents to demolish case of plaintiff and were..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Court must satisfy three essential prerequisites before granting an interim injunction i.e: (i) existence of a prima facie case in favour of applicant evincing a reasonable probability of success at trial; (ii) balance of convenience lies in favour of granting injunctive relief; and (iii) applicant..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Appellant is incontrovertibly absolute owner of property with disputed area constituting merely a fraction of entire premises - He has already entered into an agreement to redevelop the property - In these circumstances, restraint imposed by impugned injunction order significantly circumscribes..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - While deciding an application for interim relief there was no occasion for High Court to consider the documents - Legality, validity, and admissibility of those documents were matters to be considered in the suit during trial...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Order refusing to grant injunction - High Court against order of Trial Court refusing to grant injunction pending disposal of suit, could not have dismissed substantive portion of suit itself and direct that remaining part of suit be agitated in a suit filed by defendant - Approach adopted by High Court is completely..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 3 -- Interim injunction - Arbitration proceedings - Appellants attempted to encash bank guarantee furnished by respondent - If appellants were permitted to invoke bank guarantee, prayer made in S.9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, arbitration petition would likely become infructuous - Interim order restraining..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Parties directed to maintain status quo on spot viz. possession - Such order does not put any fetters upon parties to raise construction on the suit property - There is no need for any party to seek permission of Court for raising construction over portion of suit property which was in their possession -..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7 -- Appointment of commissioner - It is discretionary power of Court and a party cannot claim appointment as a matter of right - If Court is of opinion that report of Commissioner can help it in arriving at a proper and just decision, it can issue commission - But such exercise of discretion cannot be normally interfered with by..........

Showing : 71-80 of 2276 Results