LawMirror.com

Results of allotment of plot

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 529 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Plot -- Allotment - Deficiencies in the development work - Allottees given possession but without providing basic amenities with the result that allottees could not start construction - This is deficiency of service - Consumer Forum held that PUDA was not entitled to charge any interest prior to providing basic amenities and amount of interest which might have been..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 5A -- Acquisition of land - Objections - Delay and laches - Landowners challenging acquisition that authority giving land to private developers for development of residential purposes and land was not utilized for the purpose for which it was acquired i.e for industrial development - Merely because part of land is utilized for..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Plot -- Cancellation of allotment - On ground that there is default in payment of initial 50% of the cost of plot despite extension of time and that deposit in bank was without authorization as such this deposit is not valid - Endorsement by officer of corporation asking Bank to accept payment - Shows that deposit was duly accepted by corporation - Corporation continued..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Allotment of flats -- Price - In allotment letter as well as in advertisement, Condition with regard to Price of plot stated to be tentative - Date of completion was also tentative - Held, Board have clearly communicated that not only price is tentative, but date of completion is also tentative - Increased price valid with rate of interest of 15% from the date of issuance..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Allotment of plot -- Refusal for grant of extension time - Validity - Petitioner's first application for extension of time was accepted but did not arrange the funds within said extended period taking plea that commutation was received before 4 days of completing 30 days period - Petitioner was well aware of fact that amount is to be deposited within 30 days of allotment..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 63, 73, 74 -- Auction sale - Extension of time - Appellant being highest bidder deposited earnest money - Balance amount was to paid within 3 months - However, time had been extended on several occasions thus time is no longer essence of contract - DDA cancelled the allotment of plot and forfeited the earnest money without giving any..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 17 -- Quashing of resumption order - Failure to pay due amount towards allotment of plot - Respondents had issued exceptions in guidelines with regard to no, payment of allotment amount if allottees has to incur major financial expenditure on treatment of serious diseases..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 18 -- Land Acquired - For the purpose of development of residential area and utilization of land for sector roads - Option under a scheme was given to petitioners either to accept compensation in monetary terms or to seek compensation in the from of developed plots - Land was not allotted to petitioner on the ground that land was not..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Plot -- Allotment - Petitioner applied for allotment of plot on free-hold basis under a scheme by corporation - Petitioner was informed that project for which she had applied has not been found suitable by allotment committee - Petitioner has not disclosed the project for which she intended to set up - During course of arguments a reference was made to specific project..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale and Transfer of plots) Rules, 1999, Rule 3(iiia) -- Interpretation - It is not an independent provision for considering the eligibility of a licensee - It has its genesis in rule 3(iii) - It is not only licensee, who has furnished returns in Form `M' is eligible for allotment of a plot, but also a licensee, who furnished..........

Showing : 71-80 of 529 Results