LawMirror.com

Results of injunction suit

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 3056 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for mandatory injunction - Concurrent findings of facts against defendants of being a licensee on the basis of pleadings and on the basis of evidence adduced before it - Second appeal does not involve any substantial question of law - Second appeal dismissed...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Ad interim injunction was in favour of plaintiff for almost 22 years from 2002 to 2024 - Suit has been now dismissed by trial Court - Order of status quo rightly passed pending appeal...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Injunction - Co-sharers - Parties i.e plaintiffs and defendant are co-sharers - In the absence of any evidence led by plaintiff that she was in exclusive possession of suit land and that there had been a partition, suit for injunction qua a co-sharer is not maintainable...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - At the stage of rebuttal evidence - Suit for mandatory injunction - Amendment sought for substitution of mandatory injunction with word possession - It was more of a clarificatory nature and that plaintiff shall not lead any further evidence - Nature of suit and relief sought would be same but only its..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Suit for specific performance and permanent injunction - Amendment sought to incorporate the fact that registered sale deed executed by defendant no.1 in favour of defendant no.2 is not binding on plaintiff and is null and void - Plaintiff not sought amendment within reasonable time despite defendants..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Un-stamped agreement to sell - Agreement to sell is neither registered nor sufficiently stamped - Said agreement to sell could not have been considered for any purpose for accepting plaintiff's case - However, when defendant has not denied execution of document, so also receipt of part of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 3 -- Ex parte interim injunction - Trial Court while granting ex parte interim injunction has not considered the suit in its entirety - It has not even recorded existence of a prima-facie case, balance of convenience or irreparable hardship, three sine qua non for grant of mandatory injunction - No reasoning as has been mandated..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - Suit for declaration and injunction - Entire allegation has been made only against defendants - There is no basis or ground made out for impleadment of defendant Nos.3 and 4 from a careful reading of plaint - Merely because defendant nos. 1 & 2 have purchased property from defendant Nos.3 and 4, it..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Plaintiff failed to produce any documentary evidence showing his ownership over suit property nor produced any document to prove his possession over suit property - Suit rightly dismissed...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Injunction - Plaintiff not claiming any right over the land as such Simplicitor suit for injunction against true owner is not maintainable...........

Showing : 71-80 of 3056 Results