LawMirror.com

Results of order+3+rule+3+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 10994 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Stay application - Suit for mandatory and permanent injunction - No material on record to show that defendants have encroached upon or merged any area beyond their admitted possession - Since suit for partition is pending and defendants are in exclusive possession of their respective portions - Any construction raised by..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Dishonour of cheque - Production of documents - Case fixed for arguments - Documents in question are statement of account being maintained by public bank in usual course of its business - Documents are necessary in order to prove transactions between parties for showing existing..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 37 -- Execution - Money decree - Conditional warrants of arrest - JD No.4 is one of guarantors and was proceeded ex parte - Conditional warrants of arrest issued against JD No.4 - Wife of JD No.2 agreed to pay entire amount within 15 days - However, neither she had appeared before Court nor had paid decretal amount - JD No.2 is..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 23 -- Remand - Appellate Court set aside the judgment of trial Court and remanded the matter back to Trial Court for fresh adjudication upon suit, without even reversing specific finding recorded in favour of plaintiffs with respect to Will in question being surrounded by suspicious circumstances - Unless said finding recorded by..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125(4) -- (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.144(4) - Maintenance to wife - Adultery - Wife of `A' with whom respondent/wife is leading adulterous life had filed divorce petition on ground of adultery - Said circumstantial evidence are sufficient to establish the factum of `living in adultery' on a balance of preponderance..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2) -- Withdrawal of Vakalatnama - Advocate representing defendants had claimed no instructions but not sought withdrawal of his Vakalatnama - High Court without any justification went on to consider the procedure prescribed for withdrawal of Vakalatnama when neither withdrawal of Vakalatnama was permitted by Trial Court nor..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance to wife - Framing points for determination is mandatory - Order of maintenance to contain the point or points for determination, decision thereon and reasons for the decision...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - O.1.R.10 CPC authorizes Court to add any party to suit at any stage of proceedings, whose presence is found necessary, in order to enable Court to effectively and completely adjudicate the issue involved...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 58 -- Second petition U.O.21.R.58 CPC - First petition U.O.21.R.58 CPC was rejected - Second petition filed for same relief by same petitioner not maintainable, simply because after dismissal of first petition petitioner not challenged the order passed in said first petition - Order rejecting second petition cannot be said to be..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 2A -- Status quo order - Disobedience - Petitioner failed to prove by leading any convincing evidence that construction was raised by respondents after passing of order of status quo - There is thus, no violation of status quo order - Application rightly dismissed...........

Showing : 71-80 of 10994 Results