LawMirror.com

Results of proforma+proforma+defendant+proforma+defendant

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 81 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3 -- L.R's - Impleading - It is not that L.R's alone can move the application - Application can be moved by any third person - Legal representatives cannot be brought on record suo motu - Application is a must - An application by proforma respondent to bring on record L.R's is maintainable...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11 -- Jurisdiction - Complainant is a practicing advocate at Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh and for his professional engagements, he purchased this Car - On the advice and receipt of the proforma invoice proposing the price of the Car for Rs.1,66,805.92 by the respondent No.2, the complainant confirmed the proposal telephonically and that..........

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 111, 113, 114, 116 -- Setting aside of ex parte in partition case on the grounds that summons not served as wrong address mentioned in application for partition and even Munadi carried out at a place different from where land in dispute situate-Proforma respondents (brother and son of petitioner) in possession of land and regularly..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, 17 -- Allotment of shares - Complainant not submitting to the Company proper renunciation form in the prescribed proforma within the prescribed period - Deletion of name of joint holder can be done after making proper application of transfer form by affixing requisite stamp duty...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1992
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint to add certain persons as proforma defendants - Petitioners failing to prove the satisfaction of trial Court as to how such persons proposed to be brought on record as defendants are necessary for decision of suit - Not stated as to how they would be..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1986
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 4 -- Suit against three defendants for possession of land - Decreed regarding part of land against two defendants - Suit dismissed against third defendant - Appeal filed by two defendants against whom suit decreed - Only plaintiff impleaded as respondent - Third defendant not shown in array of parties as a respondent - Appeal not..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1986
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 3, 9 -- Suit for declaration that various plaintiffs separately in possession of separate parcels of suit land together with proforma defendants as co-sharers and for permanent injunction restraining defendants from interfering with their possession as well as that of pro forma defendants - All the plaintiffs not jointly interested..........

DAMAN AND DIU HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4 -- The defendant against whom the relief was claimed died and L.R's not impleaded - Proforma defendant on record-suit abates as a whole...........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1974
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 10 -- Same parties - Nominal or proforma parties in subsequent suit - Parties in both the suits are the same within the meaning of S.10 CPC...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1974
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Proper parties - Persons not ready to join as plaintiffs and impleaded as proforma defendants - Relief can be claimed for the common benefit of plaintiffs and proforma defendant...........

Showing : 71-80 of 81 Results