LawMirror.com

Results of s+389+of+cr+p+c

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 242 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s) -- Shared household - Property does not belong to parents/i, laws and in fact belongs to maternal grand parent (Nana) of husband - Said property cannot constitute as `shared household' u/s 2(s) of the Act...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s), 17, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Section 22 -- Right of residence of daughter-in-law - Whether obligation of providing shelter or roof is upon i, laws or upon husband of daughter-in-law i.e son, following guidelines issued in order to strike a balance between two acts :..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(i)(r)(s), 3(2)(va), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 506 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 3(i)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act and Ss.323, 506 IPC - Allegation that accused being pardhan of Gram Panchayat and an elected representative has made caste..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s), 17 -- Shared household - Right of daughter-in-law - Plaintiff is owner of house in question - Son of plaintiff is living separately, as divested from property and was asked to leave the house by plaintiff/father - Defendant/daughter-in-law thus, has no right to reside in the house in question after..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s) -- Shared household - Property of father - Suit premises were neither owned nor tenanted by son nor did premises belong to joint family comprising father and son - Father purchased the property against valuable consideration and he undoubtedly has a better title over suit property as against son and..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 325, 452, 427, 354, 201, 341, 34, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x), (xi), (s) -- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 325, 452, 427, 354, 201, 341, 34 IPC and S.3(1)(x), (xi), (s) of SC/ST Act - No allegations regarding uttering derogatory..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, 2(s) -- Maintenance - Liability of father-in-law - Merely because husband is absconding, as he has been declared as proclaimed offender, does not mean that father-in-law can be held liable to pay maintenance unless he is in domestic relationship with daughter-in-law and has shared household...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s) -- Shared household - Right of grand daughter-in-law - Plaintiff permitted her grandson and his wife to live in property in question as licensees - She terminated the license of her grandson - Grandson already vacated the suit property - Grand daughter-in-law thus, has no right to reside in property..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(va) -- Offence u/ss 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act - Occurrence took place at the house of complainant - No allegation that abuses were given to complainant by taking name of his caste by accused in public view as such offence u/s 3(1)(s) of the Act not..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(s), 2(f) -- Domestic relationship - Shared household - Cousin brother of husband - complainant and cousin brother of husband residing in the same building but on different floors - By no stretch of imagination it can be said that they lived together in a shared household - Complaint quashed...........

Showing : 71-80 of 242 Results