Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Once demand and voluntary acceptance of illegal gratification knowing it to be bribe is proved by evidence, conviction will follow u/s 7 of the Act against the accused...........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d) -- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Accused being I.O. in the case filed against complainant, demanded bribe of Rs.5000 from complainant for initiating action/kalandra against his neighbours - However, said neighbours already arrested and released on bail without making any demand of bribe - Panch..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(C) -- Bail - Illegal gratification and rape - Petitioner Superintendent of Police against whom there is allegation of taking bribe and commission of rape - Evidence of complainant/material witnesses including their cross-examination..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Demand of bribe from complainant for issuing notice to Sarpanch - As per evidence on record, there is inconsistent testimony of complainant as to time to visit to office of Collector for making inquiry with accused - Even, inconsistent testimonies of complainant and panch witness as..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13 -- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance of Rs.2000 as bribe - Complainant disowned her own complaint and stated that accused never demanded any amount of illegal gratification from her - Shadow witness also admitted that accused did not initiate any demand but complainant voluntarily handed over said amount to..........
Service -- Dismissal - Illegal gratification - Appellant acquitted of all the charges levelled against him - Moreover allegations against appellant were made two years after the alleged demand of bribe - Dismissal from service set aside in view of fact that there was a considerable delay in levelling charges against appellant as well as acquittal of appellant of all the..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Accused being a doctor demanded Rs.1000 from complainant to carry out her surgery - Crucial evidence as to demand and acceptance of bribe amount by accused is consistent - Minor inconsistency in the evidence of PWs would not matter at all - More so, complainant was not verbally..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Recall of witness for re-examination - When witness has supported prosecution case in his examination-in-chief and has also been cross-examined at length and he has even denied to specific suggestions put forth by defence counsel..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Mere recovery of money from the pocket of pyjama of accused by itself not cogent evidence to prove the charges of prosecution, particularly when there is no evidence to prove demand and acceptance of bribe - Accused acquitted...........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7 -- Illegal gratification - Delay of six years in lodging complaint, not explained - Accused being Sub Inspector allegedly demanded bribe of Rs.2 lakhs from complainant for not involving him in a car theft case - Complainant did not disclose the exact date when he was illegally lifted and bribe was demanded from him - Even,..........
